Letter to the DNC: Say it, Gun Control. Now.

Dear Democratic National Committee:

As a registered Democrat, I recently received in the mail the DNC’s official 2019 Democratic Party Survey.  I was more than happy to take a couple of minutes to check off and rank what I think should be key political priorities from the DNC’s various lists.  I am referring to categories and concerns that included: taxing the wealthy; reducing taxes on the middle class; Russian aggression in world affairs; Trump’s recklessness; climate change; job creation; saving Social Security; saving public education; college affordability; affordable healthcare and prescriptions; women’s rights; immigration; terrorism; and restoring U.S. cooperation with and leadership and support of NATO and other nations with whom we once had been friendly and trusting allies.      

But I was surprised to discover the number one issue for me apparently is not a prominent concern with the DNC.  I am referring to gun control.  Among a plethora of subtopics, including a repeated chance to select a choice along the lines of ‘I don’t have any problem with the Republican Party objectives,’ gun control was listed only ONE time.  It was included in a list of the responder’s personal objectives.  So I marked it yet was only allowed that one time, this my number one concern in America today.

I cannot believe my lifelong political party—the bleeding-heart liberal, altruistic, pacifist, promoters of the 1st Amendment, proud card-carrying members of the American Civil Liberties Union—would play down our nation’s obvious crucial Number One problem: continuous mass shootings that terrorize the minds of every single school kid and many if not most others who live and work in this great nation.  Gun control must be one of the Top Three issues Democrats address for urgent solutions and reform.

Instead, the DNC topics left me with the impression the Democratic Party is shying away from gun control.  Perhaps the two words leave a bad taste in the mouth of politicians these days.  We have yet to speak near as loudly as the adamant, brazen and emphatic other party/ies who reiterate to constituents any gun control is against the 2nd Amendment.  Because the DNC listed gun control only once for selecting, I assume this issue is not going to be a priority for the 2020 presidential election.  Why not?  Why the hell not?

Pacifists and ostriches

Are Democratic leaders unwilling to once again take up the hot-button issue of gun control nationwide?  The DNC survey should make clear how serious gun control is among Americans who think liberally instead of conservatively, and I bet even those who think moderately.  Mass shootings are a daily tragedy in this country.  It’s as if we all are living in a war zone.  The reason is obvious: what used to be illegal, military-style assault rifles—the type that sprays bullets to kill large numbers of humanity in seconds flat.  And in my America, that is exactly what happens every day, a mass shooting somewhere, only the most extraordinary gaining national media attention.

For the record let me say to the younger generations, it used to not be this way, and as you already know it doesn’t have to stay this way or get worse.  Gun control has been a controversial issue as long as I can remember, going back to TV’s “Donahue” and “Lou Grant.”  In 1980 an editorial cartoon depicted a handgun and a packet of saccharine with two lines that read “One of these killed 34,000 people last year in America, the other a few rats in a laboratory.  Guess which one was banned?” There was a little headway in curbing handguns, our most pressing cause of shooting deaths and disabilities back then, by mandatory background checks and three-day waiting periods.  Opponents rightfully pointed out criminals get guns any way possible and avoid government interference.

Through the decades, the gun lobby was blamed for America’s proliferation of guns, which has culminated in the adage ‘Americans have more guns than people: three for every woman, man and child.’  But in reality the National Rifle Association’s Washington, D.C., lobby dollars are small potatoes compared with megabucks from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and big pharma.  But I wonder if the NRA’s financial downturn is in any way caused by constant mass shootings, each year tens of thousands killed and disfigured.  Among our many rights in America is the right to sue anyone any time for any reason.  That is worth remembering in resolving political controversies, and usually it is the reason anything gets resolved legislatively.

It’s not the gun lobby that has created a nation with a number of psycho mass shooters.  Blame could be placed on parenting and neglect; crowded public schools where bullies seem the heroes; our free society of uncensored media including over-the-top grotesque horror and violent movies and computer games that by now a couple of generations have played to superiority.  When the objective of most computer games is to shoot and kill as many people-like animated characters as possible, how could the rush from winning time and again not warp a human’s psyche?  It’s fast-paced action; one sole focus; requiring a bit of hostility; power-inducing; lots of practice shooting; and not a moment to humanize anybody, real or animated, on the computer screen.

It was called desensitizing.  But that’s a term from the ’90s after everyone tried to understand Columbine.  Ever since, we’ve been reliving it somewhere in America, every day with most of us only aware of the few times the horror makes the national news: another mass shooting at bars, a synagogue, churches, high schools, elementary schools, mega stores, malls, country music concert, movie theaters, political rally, congressional baseball practice, or employee Christmas party.   

Now a military weapon being used on American streets is called the flamethrower, like the kind of weapon North Korean leader Kim Jong-un reportedly ordered to execute a former ally.  It seems a bullet-riddled body is no longer horrific enough, doesn’t leave the world to fully comprehend consummate power by a totalitarian leader so that all tremble in fear.  The flamethrower is popular in computer games and movies.  The enemy is no longer shot to death but torched.

Power to the people

In closing, I appreciate the DNC allowing me to rank your listed political issues for the coming storm of the 2020 presidential election.  Perhaps I’ve digressed, maybe with a flair for the dramatic.  You know our people tend to be soft at heart, easily persuaded to sympathy and sentimentality … yet also to reason and common sense for the common good.  If we’re to get tough with the ultimate American bully, then I say hit ’im with gun control.  This issue remains our nation’s worst and most horrible and unnecessary escalating problem.  Say this over and over again: Folks, we gotta have common sense gun control.  This is perpetual mass murder we’re talking about.  We have to deal with it now.  And let the people know there are solutions, compromises whereby 2nd-Amenders and gun-controllers give and take.   

Maybe I’ve come across as naïve, although I’ve lived all my life in gun-toting Texas yet may not realize the deep emotional attachment my fellow Americans have to their guns.  After all, these are people who will never relinquish their guns and proclaim, “You can take it from my cold dead hands!!”  How can we who prefer some kind of logical gun control counter that kind of fervor, whether it’s from thirty percent or half the country?  When it comes to ending mass shootings by military-style assault rifles, I’d rather be on the side of the angels than give up the fight to the cynical opposition whose only response is “America: Love it or leave it.”

Sincerely,

The Texas Tart

Facebook: To stay or not to stay? That is the question

Anyone else out there considering leaving Facebook like me?  I wrestle with it every day, more and more, as I realize the enormous political divide between the views of 98 percent of my Facebook friends and me.  This contrasts to maybe two percent, of my Facebook friends mind you, who share my views and opinions, you know, left of center.  Both sides cling so deeply to opinions as well as political, social and religious beliefs as to have been settled long ago and cemented in concrete.

It’s a tough 21st century decision leaving Facebook over other social media.  A tiny part of me wants to stay in the loop with old school friends, former colleagues and teachers, and of course a great big number of kinfolks.  I really want to hear about and see the latest pictures of everyone living their lives through their ups and downs: traveling adventures, having babies and grand young’uns, living all over the U.S. or just hangin’ in Texas, retiring, new projects, hobbies, announcing loved ones’ eternal departure or their own painful health developments along with prayer requests.  I like original snapshots with a sarcastic or humorous comment, such as misspelled words or miscalculated costs labeled on mega store shelves.  I’ve shared a few myself because I think I have a sense of humor.  There’s a lot to laugh at as we travel together through this time called life.

However, the biggest and growing part of me wants to leave Facebook altogether.  Cher did.  Or be like the cool ones who never joined, such as comedian Bill Maher.  He could foresee a problem with Facebook: allowing millions around the world to know every little move he makes and that despite celebrity, and more so because of it, it’s not a good thing.  Tens of millions checked out of Facebook after the 2016 election and the 17 federal investigations that all concluded Russia intentionally and with malice meddled with our American election and will do it again.  And they mostly and easily interfered through Facebook.

How?  By sowing seeds in thought, sight and emotionalism that were sure to divide us.  Our political enemies know us better than we know ourselves.  Russia in particular not only created fake news that to the untrained eye and mind seemed believable, but they also targeted about 80 million Facebookers to send the posts.  With help from a huge unknown internet information conglomerate, they sought specific like-minded people whose accounts on Facebook were an open page to conservative political, social and religious leanings.

Sometimes alt-right images and slogans landed on my Facebook news feed, sent from beloved family and friends, people I’ve known all my life.  And to this day, this is what takes up most of my viewing on Facebook.  For example, in the eight years leading up to the 2016 election, I scanned over a number of anti-Obama, anti-Michelle Obama and anti-Hillary Clinton bots.  These pieces were either written up like a serious news account of some fantastical feat or were simply disparaging pictures of one of these well known Democrats with a slogan like ‘Obama’s grandparents were CANNIBALS!’  Millions of Facebookers believed anything negative against Democrats in particular and with a click shared them to all their contacts including suspicious little ol’ former government reporter me.

Let your fingers do the walking

Some I’d research online and figure out that Obama’s referenced grandparents were the ones in Kenya and did not eat people.  But the bots came more and more, many coming my way which assured Obama was the devil and Trump the preferred choice of Jesus Christ.  Once Trump won the election, still the bots appeared and were shared in noticeable numbers.  The most ludicrous was a picture of the long-haired, bearded, robed, sandal-footed white Jesus that WASPs hearts aglow would instantly recognize.  ‘Jesus’ was oddly carrying an old-fashioned suitcase in each hand and even more strange running toward the viewer.  The slogan was something like “Obama kicked Jesus out of America.  But Trump welcomed Him back in!”  Holy moly. The old suitcases, and that Jesus would even need to carry them, were obvious signs to me that the image came straight from the former USSR, always decades behind the Western world when it came to new and improved things like washing machines and luggage.

But people I know believed these sentiments to be true, time and again, sharing these things mindlessly, no questions asked.  I think they thought they were sharing their Christian faith, like they wouldn’t be good Christians if they just trashed it, like I always did.  ‘It was an image of Jesus Christ, so the message must be meaningful.’

Along with political slogan images are those computer-created posters, along the lines of a photographed flower or sky or tree or ocean or dog or bird, a bit of nature and slice of life meant to lift the spirit, coupled with a not too profound statement like “Today is the first day of the rest of your life.”  These are not original or created by anyone I know on Facebook.  I’d rather see original photos and artistic expressions with and without poetic food for thought.  But it seems most social media users enjoy sending to everyone bland stock photos with positive and of course pro-conservative and Biblical quotes or a one-sentence musing.  Saturday Night Live’s meandering “Deep Thoughts” comes to mind.

For my part, I have shared articles and imagery/quotes on occasion when the moment in history is relevant.  In other words, I think before sharing.  And when I quip, I review and edit my post for brevity and clarity so that I say exactly what I mean.  But recently when I’m not busy and have lots of time to kill, I get into the Facebook feed more than I ought.  If and when I add my two cents to a thread, man the heat turns up … on me.  And I realize my place, alone with few liberals and Democrats.  [Come on, guys, where are all you in the recesses of Facebook and cyberspace?  You make up half the country; you say more than half.]  And another thing, my Facebook account’s got me wondering how come hardly any relatives and friends think like me?    

The thing about Facebook and any written or copy-and-paste commentary is the loss of human interaction.  No vocal inflection or tone.  Readers can’t tell if what is presented in quips and retorts is supposed to be sarcastic, witty, sad or aggravating.  Human emotion and intention are lost through our use and overuse of Facebook and e-mail for that matter.

So, why do I stay on Facebook?  Well, one positive has been participating in a few Facebook groups like for Beatles’ fans, classical music lovers, humane society, family page, travel group, and even worldwide spirituality.  That last one gets a long list of participants from various world religions.  It’s interesting philosophy, so I stick.  Also, I produced my own Facebook pages, at the suggestion of Facebook corporate, for my educational nonprofit and this blog.  So there would be a problem leaving, if either of my business pages is looked at in the future.  Darn.  What to do?

All my troubles seemed so far away

It’s not so much the Russian bot thing or proliferation of real fake news.  But the revelations, the political and social and religious beliefs—and the staunch unwillingness to support another’s right to a different view, as Americans used to and were willing to die for—coupled with the vitriol at President Obama and Hillary Clinton, and now that they are out of the picture, nonstop passed-along and shared internet-created by God-knows-who half-alarming half-sarcastic slogans about any controversial Democrat elected official and any American who remains liberal minded.

It’s like we’re experiencing another McCarthy era. Instead of ganging up on alleged commies, it’s just American Democrats, again half the population if not more I’m told.  I always knew the Right felt the Left were red commies, nowadays collectively referred to as socialists.  But I grew up in and was shaped and educated by the most liberal era in American history, the 1970s.  Today the malapropisms and bigoted rantings of TV’s Archie Bunker are revered and respected.  Millions of Americans believe that guy was right all along.  And equally loud-mouthed liberal Maude must have been dead wrong, especially when the over-40-year-old woman had an abortion.

I suppose when it comes to scrolling Facebook, I can just skip over the mounting derogatory slurs against my political peeps and views.  Someone advised I don’t have to respond to any inflammatory shares.  As for original comments with which I disagree or would like to point out another view, I get in more trouble for sending a quick counter.  There will be hell to pay.  And life is short.

Yet we are drawn to our smart phones and more often than not, we of a certain age I suppose, to the Facebook feed.  Checking its entirety takes up too much of our time and we are learning detrimentally affects our well being.  The latest fad besides closing our account on Facebook is to leave it alone for a week, with most participants maintaining a sudden sense of … happiness.  Yes, I remember being genuinely happy.  It had to do with being oblivious, of spender in the grass.

Remember how happy we were before Facebook?  Even way back before the internet and social media?  Before we knew every little thing about each other: our beliefs on the two no-no’s of conversation when trying to get along: politics and religion?  What a bunch of dopes we’ve become!  I get it now: None of us is ever gonna persuade another to see an issue like we do.  I’ve seen the threads of arguments go both ways on Facebook until finally one person decides no more—not in defeat, just out of emotional and intellectual exhaustion.  It is only then, when we close Facebook and put away the smart phone, that our brain returns to reality: still capable of seeing, smelling, hearing and feeling the beautiful world around us with all God’s creatures living together in harmony naturally.

Abortion: No reason, no discussion. No reasonable discussion?

First, let’s agree: nobody believes in abortion.  There are no greeting cards to sympathize or celebrate it.  For many women it must be the worst decision of their lives, often to erase a previously bad decision; just as surely as for some to erase a horrible criminal act, and more rarely but truly to save their own lives.  The problem is: abortion remains legal as many Americans believe in their heart and soul this procedure for any reason at any time is always wrong, a sin, a crime against humanity, an abomination to God.  The other problem is just the mention of the word—such as New York state legislature’s recent ‘abortion law’ that would allow late term if and when necessary to protect the health and life of the pregnant woman or teen.

Whatever stage of pregnancy, we have an image of a fully formed baby.  He or she is already named and characterized with his or her whole life planned out, if only in the hopes and prayers of others related and unrelated.  That a late-term abortion inflicts pain and suffering on the unborn is of grave concern to those who oppose the procedure.  New York was chastised as legalized baby killers by those who sincerely mourn the terminated unborn.

But … not one word, not one mention, consideration, concern, sympathy or empathy for the one who carries the unborn, the mother whose life is deemed by her physician to be at risk if she goes through with the pregnancy.  Imagine: her deep sorrow, her family’s heartbreak, the loss of faith at being placed in such an impossible and unforgiving situation.  Most people know no one who’s had to make such a choice.  Such terminated pregnancies are one to two percent, but they happen.

Science v God

The U.S. Supreme Court has heard several cases to reverse Roe v Wade.  Instead they tossed the hot political potato back to the states and let them decide.  The Court wisely perceives the issue of abortion, whether a majority of citizens is pro life or pro choice, is rooted by communities, state and region and is not universally shared throughout the entire nation—because this national issue has been one long screaming match with equal numbers embroiled in political battle.  Through the years a few states banned any and all abortions regardless of rape and incest or life-threatening fetal deformity or maternal illness likely to end in the woman’s or teen’s death.  Texas reduced medical facilities that perform abortions to less than a half dozen.  Along with mandatory waiting periods prior to obtaining an abortion, states require parental notification, mandated reading, and viewing the fetus while listening to scripted dialogue.  

In 1967 California and Colorado were first to legalize abortion in cases of rape, incest, severe handicap or pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother.  In the formation of a new human being, a lot can go wrong with the fetus and the mother.  Though almost unheard of nowadays, healthy young adult pregnant women have been known to suddenly die of natural causes or infections.  Pregnant women have been known to develop diabetes, life-threatening high blood pressure, cancer, stroke or heart attack … the list goes on.  These are not scare tactics to prevent the propagation of the species.  But a third of all pregnancies do end in miscarriage.  [That’s another hot political issue that had been questioned by male lawmakers who assume women are to blame for miscarriage instead of learning the common interruption is of natural design, simply survival of the fittest.]  The Texas Legislature passed a law that requires a death certificate and formal burial of fetal tissue from both abortion and miscarriage.  Good grief!  Have we all gone mad?  Has repulsion over abortion led to all loss of human logic and reasoning?

If college students in a course called The Spiritual and Moral Lives of Children and Adolescents could discuss abortion sans emotion, why can’t everyone?  I thought this that night when the discussion took place, in a class of women, mostly teachers, taught by a revered male theology professor and Christian minister.  “I can’t believe we’re discussing abortion,” I commented during the lesson on considering feminist spirituality.  An older classmate remarked back to me, “This is grad school.  We should be able to talk about anything.”

So we did, calmly and rationally, one voice at a time.  What I heard were women who understood and support another’s right to choose.  I was surprised to hear it … spoken aloud … confidently as if this decision was common sense and everybody knows it.  In my world most people are vehemently against.  Some of my friends made known their decision in childhood, if you can believe kids talked about abortion in those days.  We did.  I’ve made my life’s work to seek the truth, the facts, the reasons why, along with all points of view.  But this lone subject and emphatic opinion has been and remains so loud and earnest, so emotionally and religiously overwhelming that I have had to force myself to think otherwise.  Too, life has taught me to ponder the loudest mouth.

For my class comment, I shared a recollection from the spring of 1989.  Surgeon General C. Everett Koop was making the TV rounds of morning shows to announce a federal report on the mental health of women who had had an abortion.  He was pressed to collect the data by the Reagan administration.  But when Koop’s report found no scientific basis to support the premise or assumption that abortion causes lasting psychological harm to women, the Administration did not want it released.  Dr. Koop, himself pro-life, felt his duty to make the findings public.  He reported the vast majority of women in the study went on to finish high school and/or college—the main reason they opted for abortion—eventually married, gave birth to healthy children and led productive lives.  The majority agreed abortion was the worst decision of their lives but yet at the time was the right thing to do.  About two percent of women in the report experienced lingering emotional distress directly related to their decision to abort a pregnancy, Dr. Koop pointed out.  In the general population, mental illness including depression and anxiety impacts a much larger segment, from ten to twenty percent, I concluded for the class.

When millions of people ban together in a cause they believe immoral and can cry about it, it becomes mass hysteria.  Pro life or pro choice is an individual’s deeply-held feeling, opinion and personal belief.  The U.S. government got involved in the ’70s, and remains involved for now, to protect a female’s right to control her body.  The government cannot yet demand she stay pregnant regardless of developmental or maternal health.  That last part upsets anti-abortion proponents, pro-lifers.  But now we see that even the woman’s or teen’s health is not regarded as worthy of life, not even worth mentioning.  Life begins at conception, they’ve determined.  But what about the pregnant person’s right to life?

No greater love

Perhaps when a female becomes pregnant, she should sign a legal document implicitly stating her wish in the event the pregnancy causes medically documented risk to her life in the first, second or third trimester … No, that would not suffice for the millions who would rather the unborn be born and the mother die than a pregnancy terminated in order for her to live.

Visceral feelings about abortion, in the worst case scenario, and the doctors who perform it along with lawmakers who protect it, overshadow this silent universal truth: An expectant mother would gladly exchange her life for that of her unborn offspring.

And if this life-affirming rationale were not true for every pregnant female, opponents of abortion would want to interfere.

Decisions like this, heart breaking to the core of the human spirit, are intensely private, personal, medical—nobody’s business and not to be judged.     

Now, let’s agree that life is hard, harder for some than others, and sometimes there isn’t an answer regardless of our personal ethics, religious beliefs and spiritual views.  This subject has taken up decades of our time.  Yet it still demands a lot more thought … in quiet contemplation … away from the crowds.

Recalling those blue-collar blues, then and now

Yessir, I can surely sing ’em.  I come from proud working-class roots.  Except my mom was a teacher, but society kinda treats teachers like glorified babysitters instead of professionals.  Though I’ve had a couple of professional careers, I ain’t ashamed to have used more muscle than mind in many jobs throughout my life.  My first were menial, like baby sitting or cashiering at an ice cream parlor and later a barbecue joint.  Once I became of legal working age, I was thrilled to work part time at Sears at the mall.  It was the ’70s, and though Sears was losing out against rivals like JC Penney, I was happy to finally be one of those high school teen-agers with a secure job: one where I didn’t have to deal with food (except when scheduled to work the store’s nut stand) and could wear nice clothes like an adult.  I was assigned to the children’s clothing department which featured a Dallas Cowboys’ fan shop.  I wore dresses, hose and platform shoes while folding and hanging clothes but mostly picking up after customers.  It was then I realized how inconsiderate society is when shopping.  But it was a job, so hey.
 
A year later I wound up working part time as a newspaper reporter, covering the high school beat for my hometown paper.  The pay was $10 an article, which in those days had to be retyped by a typesetter.  I was a natural at the job, turned in two or three stories a week plus a column, and wore whatever I wanted though always dressing professionally when interviewing.  I got my first taste of a profession, a career.
 
I worked my way through college.  As a freshman, I tried hard to get a job at the local mall or the town newspaper.  But the timing wasn’t right.  Desperate for some source of income that would provide the incidentals of a young lady, I ended up working at a sandwich shop across from the university.  Never was really good at handling food though.  And then the customers wanted their food fast.  I was … too neat.  And slow.  And after a couple of months got the heave ho.  Just as well.  I dreaded closing by myself late at night, having to sweep and mop the entire cement floor, and then cleaning the toilets in the men’s and women’s restrooms.  P U!
 
I ventured into the logical working gal’s job of waitress.  But again, me and food jobs don’t get along.  After six weeks, I was informed I was unable to manage five tables at a time and was summarily fired during the shift.  Shoot, I hoped that job would be my college gig for spending money.  Cash tips could be $60 a night.  No one ever told me I wasn’t doing a good job.
 
But the close of a door opens a window, and mine was a much better job as a reporter for the university news service.  I was in my element, sniffing out stories and whipping up articles, using whatever typewriter I could find on campus because I did not have one of my own.  This was in the days before personal computers and laptops.  This job, however, was grant funded which meant it was precarious.  I earned $200 every two weeks and lived in an on-campus apartment, really feeling grown up for a college kid.  I was praying this job would be my lengthy gig to get me through college.  But ’tweren’t to be.  The Reagan years ushered in the Gramm-Rudman budget cuts interestingly toward colleges and universities and work-study students like me.  The job lasted one year.

Of books and nooks
The college helped me find another job, this time in the library.  I was the assistant to the assistant music librarian.  And again proved to be a natural with the prerequisite clerical tasks: naturally organized, accurate, thorough, respectful of deadlines—I proved to be the whole ball of wax.  The job required researching copyright and other publishing information for hundreds of sound recordings, books and journals—all in my college major of music.  I learned to use the computer in this library job.  Part of the work dealt with typing all data to replace the card catalog drawers.  The work had to be completely accurate, not one mistake.  Or you’d have to get back into the computer and fix it.  Anyway, I was paid the hourly wage of the day and worked a few afternoons a week.  It was enough to get by a little.  My boss and I got along fabulously.  She gave me a birthday gift, an album of Gershwin’s classical music.
 
Along my college route, however, another snag occurred.  Long story short, I wasn’t graduating as soon as I had planned.  I prematurely quit the music library job and ended up searching for another work-study position.  All along, throughout college I wrote freelance articles for the city paper but never was hired for steady work like in high school.  Reading the posted campus want ads, I saw a job for writing tutor in the library writing lab.  I applied and was interviewed.  The tutors were paid slightly more than minimum wage due to our proven college-level writing expertise: We helped peers formulate and write better papers for required coursework.  The writing lab director was impressed with my clerical background and hired me not only to tutor but to keep up with and file all the paperwork.  Again, I excelled at the chores.  But by my final year of college, even a poor college student as I was no longer qualified for federal work-study.  The writing lab director kept me on, shuffling my salary into another account, as she explained it’s all just paperwork.  
 
Cutting to the chase, I graduated … only to be unemployed for a year and a half, tried my hand at piano and voice lessons and substitute teaching before getting a job back at the college library as binding assistant.  I prepared hundreds of books and journals for professional binding and oversaw a crew of college students with repairing ripped and missing pages and worn spines.  The job required no degree and was indeed blue collar.  Everyone at the library knew me, so I was hired quickly.  It was a living for several months, but I ended up in the big city to pursue a profession: teaching or newspapering—wherever life leads.   
 
Life is a journey
Even as a graduate, I realized I would have to pay work dues.  Like I did in high school, I walked the entire mall and applied everywhere (except the food court where I wasn’t wanted anyway).  I was called by the art-frame store manager several times to be assistant manager.  Though I love art, I kept passing, holding out for something else.  Heck, I probably should’ve just taken the job.
 
Realizing I wasn’t going to be teaching the upcoming school year, I earnestly looked into joining the Peace Corps.  They were hiring college grads to teach English in the former Eastern bloc nations of Europe.  On the application I also selected to work in Africa or India.  But life took me back to the newspaper biz as a clerk at a big-city paper.  We clerks hung out together during lunch, worked on all kinds of projects like compiling contest entries including the Pulitzer Prize.  We glued and pasted articles in scrapbooks while chatting about our college days and wondering what to do now as graduates.  We earned like $6 an hour.  But I took full advantage of the opportunity before me, frequently tossing story ideas to the features editor and got one approved to write and publish, a huge triumph.  In a couple of years the paper went out of business as cities became one-paper towns.  This was before the internet, social media, blogs and dubious news outlets.
 
How did I survive?  By getting hired part-time at the homeless shelter at which I had been volunteering.  Now I was the weekend night monitor, sleeping overnight Fridays and Saturdays with the homeless.  Dressed in jeans, Beatles T-shirt and sneakers with walkie-talkie and master keys in hand, I patrolled the hallways and checked the rooms, making sure occupants were where they were supposed to be and that there were no drugs or booze of which I kept a partial blind eye.  I also had to oversee guys working community service by serving meals and cleaning the kitchen.  By day, well I subbed as a public school teacher anywhere anytime any school any subject.  So I had to switch mindsets from professional to working class, know how to act professionally then dress down to hang with the underprivileged.  I was careful not to be smug with the homeless or less than a consummate professional in dress and deed with school students and principals.
 
This exhausting whirlwind ended when I was hired full time at a used book store.  With my library experience, it was more my speed.  I could see potential for moving up in the corporation but still pursued other jobs, casting my net across the state.  On my two weekdays off, I drove all over Texas seeking work, filling out job applications (none were online yet) and doing some interviews.  To my complete surprise, I ended up back in the newspaper biz as a real-deal reporter.  I took to the job like a fish in water.  A few years later, I was hired at another newspaper.  A career was building.  Several years later, I wound up at another big-city paper then within a couple of years crossed over into teaching, building my original career aspiration sixteen years after college.  I kept up the pace with all this career stuff for close to thirty years, even earned a master’s degree along the way.
 
Free as a bird
Then boom.  Right or wrong, I took early retirement, pursued some risky ventures (like that nonprofit still in federal limbo due to the shutdown) and applied online for close to a thousand jobs—all easily done these days with one click.  Even so, finding a new job has not been easy.  To pay the bills, I’ve returned to my working-class roots … handling food, this time at a grocery store: schlepping gallons of milk and heavy bags of dog food or cases of bottled water across the counter, carefully handling cartons of eggs and bread, packing every little thing as if it were my own.  I’ve developed a chronic numbness from shoulders to fingertips and when a full day is done, my body aches like I’ve been run over by a train. But I experienced similar pain by the end of each school day teaching a decade and a half; it comes from mandatory standing. Yet I handle grocerying with a friendly smile and sincere kindness.  After all, there’s no need to be hasty or rude to paying customers.  I get the picture of what business is all about. To make a long day go by faster, I remember my newly created mantra, one for the working folks: Work, break. Work, lunch. Work, break. Work, leave.
 
As for my third act, this blog is part of it.  Who knows what else may come along in life, the thing John Lennon said happens while we’re busy making other plans?  Now that I’ve grown comfortably into middle age, I am more at ease.  The urgency to get on with the rest of my life and make a spectacular splash and workworkworkworkwork is pretty much gone—though I’m not dead yet. I figure another twenty years or more remains of work energy.
 
The inadvertent time off from career has been reflective.  Diving back into the working class, a job that requires no degree, has been not so much humbling as for me expected.  Growing up in a family that would rather be the hired hand than the big boss man, I’ve come to see a job is just a job. No need to look down on yourself for what you do for a living.
 
I’ve never thought any job I’ve had as dead-end.  I always saw potential for advancement, maybe not in the exact career I wanted or anticipated, but management maybe.  Looking back at a working life, I’ve thrived on hard work with few rewards, keeping busy while earning never-enough pay, earning my keep best I can, doing my part to help others, maybe leaving folks in a better frame of mind.  Building a career, like building a life, takes everything within us: energy, smarts, foresight, and the ability to roll with the punches because there are a lot of them and they hurt real bad.  Life is our own creation.  Relying on the internet with its plethora of ‘job’ listings—real and bogus—cannot take the place of our individuality, experience, expertise and self worth nor the spiritual bond among people.
 
For all the kids out there starting out, the journey toward work and careers is really an individual pursuit of happiness.  Don’t ever forget that.  If a working job comes along while waiting for the big career profession, consider taking it for awhile.  The work we do, the job title and menial tasks, is not what makes us who we are.  But it develops the interesting trait of character and most of all teaches us what we still need to learn about ourselves and how to treat others who come in and out of our lives.  In other words, like life itself, no job lasts forever.

Gotta loathe our federal elected officials

I am ashamed of each and every one of our elected men and women in Washington, D.C.  The only people who would play with 800,000 federal workers and their families while screwing over millions of American citizens in the process are fat, lazy, rich millionaires and even fatter billionaires.  The only obligation you have while holding your powerful office is to keep the United States government operating.  You should not be able to sleep each night in a warm cozy bed while ruining less fortunate and powerless American families.
 
Get back to ‘negotiating.’  Eat crow.  Forget about a stupid 5th century, environmentally unsound 2,000-mile wall between the U.S. and Mexico border.  For 200 years, our country has managed quite well without one.  Drugs will always be with us.  The need for drugs and the risk of addiction and overdose or addiction management will always be a part of the human condition.  That’s how our nation should deal with our big drug problem, and the educational and psychological method takes generations of time and effort.  Our drug crisis should be dealt with by our citizens, families, churches, schools and society rather than the government.  But the complex international drug trade is not the real reason for a border wall with Mexico.
 
Back to the federal shutdown, all of our national leaders from Congress to the White House must learn how to practice the Art of Diplomacy.  Government is not like running a business.  It is far more important and involves the lives of tens of millions of tax-paying citizens.  Businesses come and go.  A smart business person knows most will not last more than 30 years.  But a democrazy—excuse me—democracy must endure.  It requires constant effort, hard work, difficult decisions, painful emotions, sleepless nights, concern for the greater good, selflessness and most importantly intelligence … as was phrased in our nation’s beginnings, common sense.
 
Enough with the cruelty trickling down from the very top of the U.S. power structure.  Everything in life is about compromise.  Poor people know how to do it every day.  Families with one TV compromise on the shows they will watch.  They compromise at the grocery store when deciding which is cheaper fresh fruit or canned, which is more important new towels or milk.
 
March of the penguins
Where are the chambers of commerce, bankers and the rest of the corporate suits taking to the streets demanding an end to another childish national government shutdown?  They’re the ones who understand local economics: how every dollar spent in a community rolls over seven times, meaning seven businesses benefit from people with jobs.
 
Shutting down the government and ruining livelihoods should be illegal in the United States of America.  We’re not a banana republic where a game of chicken is played by the powerful, the heartless and the gutless.  Or are we?  The strength of a leader is not measured in fear but character.  The character of a leader is developed by having actually worked from the bottom up instead of growing up with a silver spoon in the mouth.  A leader should reflect an exemplary moral life grounded in decency and empathy toward our fellow man, not brute force just to break the will of others.

Our national leaders have forgotten who they work for and who elected them.  The American rich no doubt have the upper hand financially.  But their tiny numbers are no match to the hundreds of millions of us who have to work to pay bills and actually want to work for self worth.  We the People must remind our elected officials they work for us.  In this country, pal, the People are in charge.  Every elected official works for us and is paid by our sweat, physical or mental or both.  You have no right to shutdown our federal government while expecting the most vital work still be done by employees without pay.  It’s uncivilized, moronic, and unAmerican, and we will not tolerate it. Consider this a final warning, a come-to-Jesus meeting.

Ready for the ninth and final year of the 20teens?

As we face the end of a tumultuous decade, let us not be downtrodden but prepare for the most spectacular event certainly yet to come, if history tells us anything.  The 21st century teen years were not unlike living with a surly adolescent: pushing toward unfettered independence while desperately seeking guidance and assurance of parental love; staying out beyond curfew, mouthing off and breaking other rules to push boundaries and discover if any punishment still stings or breaks the will; learning to drive as anxious backseat parents pray silently for their safe return and instant maturity of their teen-age offspring; breaking away from believing everything ever taught by any adult while developing their own cynical if not radical views on complex issues like politics and religion.  Well, parental old guard, we made it through with sanity intact, some of us even spotting a few rays of light that will transform rebellious youth into admirable friends, someday.  
 
In this decade the world reached consummate concern for the future of life on planet Earth with the Paris climate accord, and Americans reincarnated the Women’s Rights movement.  With more mass shootings than any previous decade (a mass shooting every single day in America), future legislation in this final decade year or the following year will undoubtedly address the issue soberly than ever before and do something that will significantly halt our national recurring horror especially among our children at school.  As soon as Trump swarmed in as president, tens of millions of Americans and others around the world protested in the streets not only making known their distrust of Trumpian politics and the man himself but maintaining the election and outcome were dubious and possibly corrupt.  A return to civility and common decency among politicians will likely prevent another national election of the biggest-and-baddest ever again.
 
Number 9
But 2019 holds promise for mankind as a review of past final decade years have shown:
 
1909—The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) founded by mostly white Americans appalled by routine lynching of black Americans;
1919—The League of Nations formed, later to be reconstituted as the United Nations, to prevent future world wars and political and economic catastrophes;
1929—The stock market crash, though ushering in the Great Depression, would lead to a New Deal president with innovative and far-reaching public projects putting Americans back to work as well as setting controls on the banking industry while federally insuring depositors;
1939—World War II officially begins along with the ultra secretive Manhattan Project that would eventually ensure world dominance of the United States at the cost of our vigilance to prevent a future nuclear war;
1949—Communism takes brutal control in China while ironically novelist George Orwell publishes his foreboding political satire Nineteen Eighty Four, which depicts the real story of life within a country of thought control, word removal, surveillance cameras, and on-cue weeping by devotees of Big Brother;
1959—The Twilight Zone begins airing nationwide, each black-and-white episode probing the human imagination with godly or godless wonder but mostly bringing to life the deepest darkest fears of America’s post-war generation not to mention the little Baby Boomers watching each week beside their parents;
1969—THE most important moment in human history, televised by computer technology, the world witnessing three brave American astronauts landing then walking on the moon, an incredulous feat boosting American pride despite hostility and division while leaving most feeling insignificant when viewing Earth from outer space;
1979—Middle East politics, culture and religion force themselves permanently into the everyday psyche of a previously oblivious free-wheeling, car-loving, get-up-and-go American society;
1989—The fall of the Berlin Wall meant Western culture and capitalism ‘beat’ the propped-up utopia promised but never realized for decades among citizens forced to live behind the Iron Curtain of the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics;
1999—The Columbine High School shooting massacre, along with a Fort Worth church shooting at a teen service, indicated a horrific rift in American mentality when it comes to guns, gun rights, constitutional liberty, violent imagery portrayed in video games and movies, and mental illness—all of which to this day remain unresolved and incomprehensible yet politically strengthened, divisive and socially ruinous as ever an issue faced by Americans;
2009—The first African-American elected President of the United States, Barack Obama remained calm, cool and collected in every crisis and political battle, often resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court as Congress refused to practice diplomacy during his two terms in office.     
 
21st century teens
Highlights of this decade could be: Obamacare; Russia playing Americans via social media; Curiosity Rover on Mars; Lance Armstrong; Bill Cosby; Ebola; ISIS; Black Lives Matter; same-sex marriage; the Trump presidential campaign and election; Hillary Clinton, first woman to run by a major party for U.S. president; Brexit, indicating all’s not well in globalism; Me Too; NFL players kneeling during the National Anthem; removal of Confederate statues; Unite the Right rally chant “Jews will not replace us”; and the deadly opioid crisis.
 
ISIS terrorist attacks continued worldwide and at home, from the office of a French satirical publication to the Boston Marathon; from a Paris football stadium, restaurants and rock concert to a San Bernardino Christmas party and an Orlando nightclub.
 
But a review of the past nine years in America shows increased deadly mass shootings that left hundreds dead and many more wounded, physically and emotionally:
2011: at a political rally; 
2012: at a movie theater and then at an elementary school;
2015: at an African-American church;
2016: at a nightclub in Orlando;
2017: at a Baptist church and then at a country show in Las Vegas.
 
What will be the memorable history of 2018?  Probably more mass shootings like the one at a Florida high school.  But that time youth found the wherewithal to create a movement of their own, one for the nation really, those of us sick and tired of legislators sitting on their butts and unwilling to do something to prevent mass shooting murder sprees.  The first Never Again rally brought marches in every state as well as sympathizing nations.  One march was in New York City where none other than Paul McCartney was spotted marching with the crowd.  Asked why he was participating, his answer was simple as he explained he, too, has been impacted by gun violence, recalling a dear friend shot to death.
 
Yet school shooting massacres didn’t stop as somehow we were surprised with the same story from the small Texas town of Santa Fe.  Mass shootings continued nationwide with reporters killed inside the newsroom of The Capital in Maryland, youth at a gamer tournament, Jews at a synagogue, and young adults at a California bar. 
 
If there is an optimistic capper for the Teen decade of the 21st century, 2019 would produce meaningful gun legislation and election security to ensure the sanctity of our democratic process.  As for the nation’s citizens, a return to public civility in tongue, tone, tweet and email would go a long way in restoring American trust in our fellow Americans regardless of political beliefs and affiliations.  We can vote for whomever we want. Remember?

Along the same lines, Americans say they don’t know who to trust when it comes to the news, referring to online and cable TV products. For that matter, Americans aren’t that concerned when journalists are shot in newsrooms or hacked to death by order of a national leader, one who does not support free speech or a free press.  A 21st century American president who refers to the media as the ‘enemy of the people’ along with national apathy toward journalism and journalists is the most incredible and detrimental development to come out of the 20teens, in my opinion.  As adolescents are prone to think they know everything already, perhaps the forthcoming decade will bring maturity and the serious mindful responsible actions of a grown-up.

Twelve daze of Trumpmess

On the first day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

a federal inquiry!

On the second day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

two hushed honeys and a federal inquiry!

On the third day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

three years for fixin’, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the fourth day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

4 a.m. tweeting, three years for fixin’, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the fifth day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

five plea deals!

4 a.m. tweets, three prison years, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the sixth day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

six sneaky staffers,

five plea deals!

4 a.m. tweets, three prison years, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the seventh day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

seven Russian theories, six sneaky staffers,

five plea deals!

4 a.m. tweets, three prison years, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the eighth day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

eight victory rallies, seven Russian theories, six sneaky staffers,

five plea deals!

4 a.m. tweets, three prison years, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the ninth day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

nine DNC hackers, eight victory rallies, seven Russian theories,

six sneaky staffers,

five plea deals!

4 a.m. tweets, three prison years, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the tenth day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

ten legal experts, nine DNC hackers, eight victory rallies,

seven Russian theories, six sneaky staffers,

five plea deals!

4 a.m. tweets, three prison years, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the eleventh day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

11 a.m. work days, ten legal experts, nine DNC hackers,

eight victory rallies,seven Russian theories, six sneaky staffers,

five plea deals!

4 a.m. tweets, three prison years, two hushed honeys

and a federal inquiry!

On the twelfth day of Trumpmess, our country came to see

twelve meddlin’ Russians, 11 a.m. work days, ten legal experts,

nine DNC hackers, eight victory rallies, seven Russian theories,

six sneaky staffers,

five plea deals!

4 a.m. tweets, three prison years, two hushed honeys …

and a federal inquiry!! 

A little Christmas brings time to reflect, remember and rejoice

Ours will be a little Christmas this year.  No big deal.  No winter vacation.  No decking the halls with Christmas memorabilia as in years past.  No expensive presents or major gifts (that I know of, tee!).   No, my husband and dogs and I will have to be content sharing love and appreciation and maybe a hot toddy.  The Christmas lack, merchandise-wise, is due to me … still waiting to hear back from our federal government.  Remember around Easter/Passover when I blogged about starting a new nonprofit to advocate for journalism and journalists?  That’s my one and only attempt at starting a business and relying on final approval from our government, as my work will be not-profit driven, just a passionate cause.

As for spreading yuletide cheer, I’ll spend a few dollars on small gifties.  I won’t say exactly what, just in case a recipient is reading.  But suffice it to say, my contributions this year will be stocking stuffers.

But oh how I’ve enjoyed some wonderful Christmases past!  My earliest memories are sealed in black-and-white snapshots: of artificial Christmas trees, green or white, decorated with fragile bulbs of electric red, yellow, blue and green.  And each day coming home from elementary school to find another huge box wrapped in red paper with Santas and reindeer or wreaths.  Inside may have been a girl’s vanity dressing table or a psychedelic-designed record player or a new doll like Velvet.  My parents spared no expense on the holiday, so it seemed.  But actually my sibling and I were learning some valuable lessons.  In those days my father worked at Sears and had a big employee discount.  So he allowed us to pick anything we wanted from the annual Wishbook up to $50 each.  We didn’t know about taxes but often would pick toys totaling right up to $49.99, never daring to go over $50.  It really was generous of Dad.

During the ’70s I usually chose the latest Barbie dolls, clothes and accessories.  My entire collection is from the closets of TV’s Mary Richards and Rhoda Morgenstern.  One year Santa gave me something I did not order: a Barbie Karosel Kitchen.  It ran on large batteries that needed frequent replacement, but it contained six sections, one with a laundry machine, next a clothes dryer, a kitchen sink, dishwasher, oven, and refrigerator.  You’d press a button to turn the red Karosel and press another button for sounds resembling cleaning, washing or cooking.  It was kinda strange, especially since I didn’t ask for it.  Why would a kid want to spend time with Barbie pretending to do chores?

It took a couple of years for me to find Barbie clothes in the Wishbook.  But I ended up with lots of fashions like assorted boots and heels, large round pastel eyewear, all to go with miniskirts and maxi dresses of the era.  I ordered a Barbie car, an orange two-seat convertible; a tent with sleeping bags and tiny outdoor cooking gear; and my most cherished present a Barbie sleep-and-keep case.  The case stored two Barbies, but I squeezed in my Ken dolls, too, and a pile of clothes and grooming accessories.  One side allowed for a pull-down bed—a tribute to the ’70s with wall art like Love and the peace sign and a groovy flowery bedspread of bright orange and hot pink.

The Christmas blog

Of all my childhood preteen memories, Christmas 1973 is the most important.  It was the year my parents surprised me with the most enormous and heavy present too big to fit under the Christmas tree.  I had no idea what it could be as it sat there a couple of weeks tagged with my name.  So when the unwrapping arrived, I found this humongous gift was a real stereo system complete with two large separate speakers and a turntable/FM AM radio/8-track player encased in a faux brown wood compartment, placed above a rack for my growing record collection.  It was the gift I never knew I wanted.

My parents, however, had an ulterior motive in providing me such an expensive and totally unexpected present.  For a couple of years, I had a habit of taking over their stereo console in the den, turning their country radio stations to rock and listening to my records on their grand system instead of my little kid record player.  I was of an age where I could distinguish the audible nuances between a record player and a stereo.  I was 11.  So they set me up with a stereo system popular with teens and young adults.  Wow!  They just wanted me to listen to the music I liked in my bedroom.  Guess they tired of hearing Grand Funk’s We’re an American Band over and over and over again.  I didn’t realize it back then, but that gift made such a life-altering impact as I grew into a serious music lover.  Too, I realized I had to be mature handling a real stereo system.  For a couple of years I wouldn’t allow my friends to touch it.

By the end of the ’70s, Christmas was getting to be a drag.  I was old enough to realize how much things cost, no longer able to give my friends individual gifts anymore.  By the time I was 18, our family didn’t even put up a tree let alone bother with wrapping gifts.  Still, unexpectedly my mother got me a large cylinder basket and matching rattan chair from Pier 1.  She knew I loved hanging out at that store, soaking up its exotic Eastern world allure.  I walked into my bedroom after work one night, turned on the light, and there were the furnishings made in India or some place, awaiting my delight and appropriate thankfulness.

It’s not that I’m depressed this year, but Christmas is a time of massive amounts of stuff including food that just makes us all fat and fatter.  It is extremely hard to have Christmas in moderation, isn’t it?  But when money is sparse, that’s how it has to be.  My parents always recalled their impoverished Depression-era childhood Christmases, when the gift would be hair supplies, socks, and if lucky assorted nuts still in their shells and an orange.  Just the smell of an orange brings back Christmas memories, my folks say year round.  Not for me.  It’s the smell of Scotch tape!  The connection must be from wrapping gifts during the holidays.

This year I am not pulling out the Christmas boxes and displaying all the seasonal collections around the house.  I did splurge on purchasing one new Christmas decoration: a replica of a mid-century white porcelain Christmas tree with tiny multi-colored plastic bulbs.  It operates on batteries and has a four-hour timer.  Our house was built in 1946, and I had seen the original tree décor at antique shops.  So I knew it would fit the past Christmases spent by the previous family of our home.  That lone colorful white Christmas tree, placed on a table, is enough to celebrate the season, that plus the wreath on the front door.  And for the first time, I’m not mailing Christmas cards.  Sorry ya’ll.  I’ll create some festive image and season’s greeting on the computer and mass email to friends and family.

More importantly is not to forget what we’re celebrating along with the birth of Christ and the beginning of a new world religion if not an optimistic worldview—based on forgiveness and love for all mankind.  Winter solstice, an ancient celebration of earth and the changing season, occurs around the same time as Christmas, and it is no coincidence.  It doesn’t matter when Christ was born, but the timing in December wraps up, so to speak, a holy day of respect and recognition of our home planet and our family: of cold and warmth, bitter and sweet, past and present, concern and comfort.  Christmas is what we make it, for ourselves and for others.  So happy holidaze everyone this year!  Let us be merry and bright and full of good cheer!

Texas wants to straighten out straight-party ballots and voters

They’re not fooling me one bit: the Texas Legislature and all the work they’ve been a-doin’ from the Clinton to the Obama administrations, gerrymandering precincts and now disallowing voters to select the straight-party option.  I remember during the 20th century when local Republican and Democratic party chairs recommended all voters simply check the straight-party option conveniently located at the top of the ballot, each party chair maintaining theirs had the best and most outstanding candidates in all races.  In that bygone era the party elders just wanted to make it easy on voters since so many if not most don’t vote at all.  Too, they knew most voters don’t bother researching each and every race such as all those district judgeships and state commissions—names we’ve never heard of let alone the duties of each office.

Yeah, we’re just a bunch of ignert ol’ hicks spread out all over this great big Lone Star state like a swipe of mustard on a bun.  All right, maybe ignorance is kinda true for a lot of voters, folks just pickin’ names on the ballot based on vague familiarity and past acquaintances from high school and church (no one we really know or heard of running for office) or to quote the late Molly Ivins when Texas voters chose ‘cute’ names on the ballot and in the process voted for “the wrong Don Yarborough.”  Mostly straight-ticket voters are probably sticking to the political party with which they define themselves and likely always have.

My fellow Texans, it’s gonna be up to us to decide how we gonna play this game called e-lek-shuns.  And it’s gotta start with knowing the difference between Republicans and Democrats.

Grandpa knew the difference

My grandfather was asked this question by his children.  Back in those days, he intently listened to the news on the radio as well as read the daily newspaper.  He took our nation’s history and voting privilege very seriously, and as a poor man trying to provide for his ever-expanding family he sought some kind of ray of hope, of financial stability on the horizon.  He was, of course, devoted to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  Grandpa  taught his children: Democrats care about the common man while Republicans care about money.  Simple response from a not-so-simple man living in desperately hard times.  I don’t know if he ever perceived how the two governing concepts go hand in hand.

So the old Depression-era distinction or belief in the two parties continued until the 1960s, when if you can believe it, people down South switched party affiliations like … hmm, like it was the end of the world.  The switcheroo had to do with the Civil Rights movement and the presidency of Lyndon Johnson.  Southern Democrats were gonna have to support African Americans, simple as that.  Instead many white Democrats ran lickety-split to the Republicans, whose political agenda never promoted the advancement of people of color.

Then there was the hippy factor and the Vietnam War, separating American voters into hawks and doves.  Doves just wanted to make love not war; hawks were ready to fight for any reason anywhere—something like that.  Then American politics got really ugly in the ’70s with radical Democrats, college youth completely dissatisfied with the status quo by the Man.  To be a Democrat in those days implied one may support violent protests at home to end the war overseas.  A generation gap evolved with Democrats usually younger voters and Republicans their parents.

Ready for his close up

Enter Ronald Reagan, the law-and-order governor of Hippie California.  Americans generally forgot he used to be a Democrat before switching to the GOP.  Why?  It’s no mystery but one that needs reviewing.  His wealth increased and so did his tax rate.  He no longer believed that government could and should solve all the country’s problems.  He believed government was the problem.  Many Democrats, former liberals who at the time were parents of the Mini Boom, agreed.  They were called Reagan Democrats.

So we’re back to the two-pronged philosophy of our country divided by Democrats and Republicans.  Clinton’s presidency brought together the parties.  His style was called Business Democrats, AKA New Democrats, and he was quite adept at using tax revenue to build and create new business especially in neglected communities.  Did I mention he is credited for balancing the federal budget and erasing the deficit to $0?  That feat was not mere luck but phenomenal economic foresight.

Money is the root

A government teacher taught the difference between Democrats and Republicans by quipping: Republicans see a cockroach and call an exterminator while Democrats see one and stomp it with a shoe.  Democrats keep their curtains open when they shouldn’t while Republicans, though unnecessary, keep their curtains closed.  Shtick was his way to answer the age-old American question, “What’s the difference between a Democrat and a Republican?”

I think the answer is similar to the difference between Missionary and Southern Baptists.  It’s about where the money goes based on the priorities of the organization.  Republicans believe, in the paraphrased adage of President Cal Coolidge, the business of America is business.  Business has to be good for the little guy to prosper, for anyone to prosper.  A fair point.  Democrats believe government should help the little guy when he cannot take care of himself through employment, education, food and healthcare.  An altruistic notion.

So now, how have the two long-standing American political Parties come to blows, like sending mail bombs to big-name Democrats, over how the money’s spent?  What the hell?  Some say the animosity came from the Democrats doing in President Richard Nixon.  Others say the hatred seeped in when Republican political know-it-all Newt Gingrich created a list of adjectives to use whenever speaking about Democratic opponents.  Such words that would eventually be tied to all Democrats include: liberal, sick, pathetic, weak, corrupt, destructive, intolerant, insensitive, radical, traitors, self-serving, selfish, incompetent.  Hold on just a cotton-pickin’ minute!  Don’t all these words describe some Republican leaders, too, or anybody for that matter?  Goodness gracious.

That list of adjectives cleverly devised to stick it to Democrats along with the modern internet age of fast-paced political arguments have escalated the so-called major differences between political Parties to a deadly battle of sorts, still without declaring civil war … yet … again.

Straight-jacket politics

Back to the original subject, the straight-party ticket may not be the smartest way to vote especially in the Information Age when voters really should look up any candidate and read about him or her and decide for ourselves who we like or trust.  But the straight-party ticket obviously has been used in recent national elections as a protest vote, one that clearly tells the other Party in charge: “I can no longer sit back and let your side ruin the country, in my humble opinion as an American citizen, taxpayer and voter.”  The straight-party vote was more or less a ‘fed-up’ and ‘throw-the-bums out’ maneuver … one that a sore-head Party decided to take away from all of us.  The straight-party vote was just too overwhelming and powerful and maybe primarily used by Democrats.

Some say all the other states do not allow a straight-party line on their election ballots, so Texas should follow suit.  Why I never thought I’d live to see the day Texas would want to be like all the other states in the Union.  Our elected officials in Austin may say this is for our own good, like making a kid drink milk, that using our brains to make a decision as crucial as voting for the right Don Yarborough is literally life or death.  It’s life and death all right, of expanding political thought, social movement and cultural change.  But hey, we’re all Americans.  Democrats and Republicans have too much in common to want to kill the other side.  Right?

God bless immigrants … because America doesn’t want to anymore

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

the wretched refuse of your teeming shores.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me.

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

 

Whack!  Off with her head!!  Seems Der Spiegel over in Germany was right all along about President Donald Trump.  Right after the 2016 election, the European news journal ran a cover cartoon depiction of Trump: holding in one hand a bloody sword while the other held up the bleeding head of the Statue of Liberty.  The revolting editorial cartoon, in color for the macabre, was supposed to be political satire based on Trump’s agenda if and when elected U.S. president.  His first order of business was to stop immigration (soft-pedaled as illegal immigration).  The Statue of Liberty has long been a world renowned symbol of America’s embrace of immigrants regardless of nationality, race, ethnicity or religion.

And now President Trump’s plan to halt immigration, specifically of Latin Americans, is coming to fruition right after the 2018 midterm election.  He and he alone ordered the U.S. military to protect the border.  There are two conflicts with the presidential order.  One is illegal immigration, already handled by federal border patrol agents.  Then there is the issue of asylum.

Any former American school student must find it hard to believe the United States will no longer provide asylum to Latin American refugees, whether they walked a thousand miles in a massive crowd or crossed the border as a family with children.  Border patrol agents know what to do when catching and apprehending anyone illegally crossing the border.  If individuals claim asylum, they are allowed temporary entrance into the U.S. but must wait for federal immigration courts to hear their plea, often just the immigrant’s word based on personal experience without documentation such as photos and cell phone videos of rapes and gang shootings or recorded threats against their lives.  The Hondurans heading north reportedly to America have claimed their lives are in danger, meaning they would certainly be tortured and/or killed if they remained in their homeland … which is where they’d rather live, don’t you think?

Home is where the heart is

Political and religious asylum has been a human right long recognized and respected by the U.S. probably because ours is a nation of immigrants, people whose lineage is not originally from this part of the world.  The majority of us can check our family history online nowadays and find when our roots were firmly planted in the soil of America, once called the New World by Europeans of the Renaissance and Enlightenment eras.

In the digital age of the 21st century, the power in charge says Americans have had enough of foreigners migrating to our shores.  Why do they keep coming here when they know Americans will resent and suppress them?  When they know we’ll keep them poor, yell at ’em to speak English, and refuse to get to know them or help in any way other than begrudgingly with our hard-earned tax dollars?  Hmm.  Money is always the initial prejudice.

According to the U.S. budget breakdown, the biggest slice of the pie goes to support the military, then another big chunk goes to Medicare (the elderly who paid into it during their working years), and so on until finally a tiny sliver is left to assist legal immigrants with low-income housing, some foodstuffs, very basic healthcare (Medicaid) and enforced public schooling.

The poem at the foot of the Statue of Liberty had it right all along: Most immigrants who come to this country—like most of our ancestors—are poor not rich, hardly living a life of privilege off U.S. taxpayers.  And immigrants stay poor for at least one generation.  Most immigrants to this country are good conscientious people, folks just wanting to survive and yes prosper, actually begging for what they believed was a natural God-given human right to be free from persecution.  They are willing to do anything, work any job, accept the lowest wage, reside in high-crime areas, put up with taunts and jeers coming from the top of our political power structure and supported wholeheartedly by the loudest of Americans—people who’ve forgotten their heritage, their family’s journey not all that long ago.  What a shame.

To be poor and also an immigrant is to be liberal, meaning open minded to other ways of living and thinking.  Right there is the core issue irritating the heart of Americans who do not believe their tax dollars and our nation should support immigrants for any reason whatsoever.  Immigrants, legal or illegal, have never been our country’s Number One problem, likened to an infestation of cockroaches that must be exterminated.

Immigrants to America do not deserve to be kicked in the gut by steel boots and scorned with hateful rhetoric and general meanness.  And if we’re really being honest, immigrants seeking asylum, from homelands dominated by violent crazy narco governments, do not have in their numbers the thousands of native-born American rapists and criminal sociopaths who daily terrorize citizens until stopped by police.  The sociopaths of narco governments remain behind in the countries they dominate.  For life is good, why would they ever leave?

Meanwhile in New York Harbor, modern Americans can tear down the plaque at the foot of Lady Liberty or redact the poetic words once symbolizing the golden purpose of our country’s beautiful and just existence.  But those very words and the profound meaning will not be ignored or forgotten by millions of Americans and neither will our consecrated assurance in the sanctity of humanity.  We’re all just human beings down here, trying to stay alive, walking toward the light of liberty wherever we find it near or far.  Like it or not, we all are equal to each other, maybe not in the eyes of the races but in the eyes of our Creator, the One we each answer to one way or another.