First, let’s agree: nobody believes in abortion. There are no greeting cards to sympathize or celebrate it. For many women it must be the worst decision of their lives, often to erase a previously bad decision; just as surely as for some to erase a horrible criminal act, and more rarely but truly to save their own lives. The problem is: abortion remains legal as many Americans believe in their heart and soul this procedure for any reason at any time is always wrong, a sin, a crime against humanity, an abomination to God. The other problem is just the mention of the word—such as New York state legislature’s recent ‘abortion law’ that would allow late term if and when necessary to protect the health and life of the pregnant woman or teen.
Whatever stage of pregnancy, we have an image of a fully formed baby. He or she is already named and characterized with his or her whole life planned out, if only in the hopes and prayers of others related and unrelated. That a late-term abortion inflicts pain and suffering on the unborn is of grave concern to those who oppose the procedure. New York was chastised as legalized baby killers by those who sincerely mourn the terminated unborn.
But … not one word, not one mention, consideration, concern, sympathy or empathy for the one who carries the unborn, the mother whose life is deemed by her physician to be at risk if she goes through with the pregnancy. Imagine: her deep sorrow, her family’s heartbreak, the loss of faith at being placed in such an impossible and unforgiving situation. Most people know no one who’s had to make such a choice. Such terminated pregnancies are one to two percent, but they happen.
Science v God
The U.S. Supreme Court has heard several cases to reverse Roe v Wade. Instead they tossed the hot political potato back to the states and let them decide. The Court wisely perceives the issue of abortion, whether a majority of citizens is pro life or pro choice, is rooted by communities, state and region and is not universally shared throughout the entire nation—because this national issue has been one long screaming match with equal numbers embroiled in political battle. Through the years a few states banned any and all abortions regardless of rape and incest or life-threatening fetal deformity or maternal illness likely to end in the woman’s or teen’s death. Texas reduced medical facilities that perform abortions to less than a half dozen. Along with mandatory waiting periods prior to obtaining an abortion, states require parental notification, mandated reading, and viewing the fetus while listening to scripted dialogue.
In 1967 California and Colorado were first to legalize abortion in cases of rape, incest, severe handicap or pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother. In the formation of a new human being, a lot can go wrong with the fetus and the mother. Though almost unheard of nowadays, healthy young adult pregnant women have been known to suddenly die of natural causes or infections. Pregnant women have been known to develop diabetes, life-threatening high blood pressure, cancer, stroke or heart attack … the list goes on. These are not scare tactics to prevent the propagation of the species. But a third of all pregnancies do end in miscarriage. [That’s another hot political issue that had been questioned by male lawmakers who assume women are to blame for miscarriage instead of learning the common interruption is of natural design, simply survival of the fittest.] The Texas Legislature passed a law that requires a death certificate and formal burial of fetal tissue from both abortion and miscarriage. Good grief! Have we all gone mad? Has repulsion over abortion led to all loss of human logic and reasoning?
If college students in a course called The Spiritual and Moral Lives of Children and Adolescents could discuss abortion sans emotion, why can’t everyone? I thought this that night when the discussion took place, in a class of women, mostly teachers, taught by a revered male theology professor and Christian minister. “I can’t believe we’re discussing abortion,” I commented during the lesson on considering feminist spirituality. An older classmate remarked back to me, “This is grad school. We should be able to talk about anything.”
So we did, calmly and rationally, one voice at a time. What I heard were women who understood and support another’s right to choose. I was surprised to hear it … spoken aloud … confidently as if this decision was common sense and everybody knows it. In my world most people are vehemently against. Some of my friends made known their decision in childhood, if you can believe kids talked about abortion in those days. We did. I’ve made my life’s work to seek the truth, the facts, the reasons why, along with all points of view. But this lone subject and emphatic opinion has been and remains so loud and earnest, so emotionally and religiously overwhelming that I have had to force myself to think otherwise. Too, life has taught me to ponder the loudest mouth.
For my class comment, I shared a recollection from the spring of 1989. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop was making the TV rounds of morning shows to announce a federal report on the mental health of women who had had an abortion. He was pressed to collect the data by the Reagan administration. But when Koop’s report found no scientific basis to support the premise or assumption that abortion causes lasting psychological harm to women, the Administration did not want it released. Dr. Koop, himself pro-life, felt his duty to make the findings public. He reported the vast majority of women in the study went on to finish high school and/or college—the main reason they opted for abortion—eventually married, gave birth to healthy children and led productive lives. The majority agreed abortion was the worst decision of their lives but yet at the time was the right thing to do. About two percent of women in the report experienced lingering emotional distress directly related to their decision to abort a pregnancy, Dr. Koop pointed out. In the general population, mental illness including depression and anxiety impacts a much larger segment, from ten to twenty percent, I concluded for the class.
When millions of people ban together in a cause they believe immoral and can cry about it, it becomes mass hysteria. Pro life or pro choice is an individual’s deeply-held feeling, opinion and personal belief. The U.S. government got involved in the ’70s, and remains involved for now, to protect a female’s right to control her body. The government cannot yet demand she stay pregnant regardless of developmental or maternal health. That last part upsets anti-abortion proponents, pro-lifers. But now we see that even the woman’s or teen’s health is not regarded as worthy of life, not even worth mentioning. Life begins at conception, they’ve determined. But what about the pregnant person’s right to life?
No greater love
Perhaps when a female becomes pregnant, she should sign a legal document implicitly stating her wish in the event the pregnancy causes medically documented risk to her life in the first, second or third trimester … No, that would not suffice for the millions who would rather the unborn be born and the mother die than a pregnancy terminated in order for her to live.
Visceral feelings about abortion, in the worst case scenario, and the doctors who perform it along with lawmakers who protect it, overshadow this silent universal truth: An expectant mother would gladly exchange her life for that of her unborn offspring.
And if this life-affirming rationale were not true for every pregnant female, opponents of abortion would want to interfere.
Decisions like this, heart breaking to the core of the human spirit, are intensely private, personal, medical—nobody’s business and not to be judged.
Now, let’s agree that life is hard, harder for some than others, and sometimes there isn’t an answer regardless of our personal ethics, religious beliefs and spiritual views. This subject has taken up decades of our time. Yet it still demands a lot more thought … in quiet contemplation … away from the crowds.