How have Americans, of all people, made politi-talk impossible, intollerable & unbearable?

On Inauguration Day 2009 when Barack Obama would take the Oath of Office, the school where I was a teacher had staff development.  We attended morning meetings to psyche up for the spring semester.  Then late morning we were instructed to gather in the cafeteria.  We were treated to hot dogs, potato salad and baked beans and ice cream as a big TV was rolled in.  We watched together a historic moment in our nation.  An African American was going to be President, and we along with millions of Americans across the country and billions of people around the world were granted the opportunity to watch the entire televised process.  Aretha Franklin sang “My Country, ’Tis of Thee” outdoors in what was obviously bitter cold weather.  Later Obama, so youthful, confident and determined, presented his Inaugural speech, one that assured he was the President of every American.

We teachers chatted throughout the inauguration ceremonies, paying attention to certain highlights.  As I was still kind of new to the teaching profession or working within a multicultural staff, I was indeed surprised our required staff development day would be spent watching the inauguration.  Then again, it was a historic moment, and we were educators.  In the schools where I’ve taught, often I was the minority, certainly so in every classroom of students.  This school was perhaps an equal mix of faculty spanning the races, colors, ethnicities and cultures of America Herself.  Prior to the election, I kept to myself about whom I supported for President: Obama or Republican John McCain.  I was surprised to hear some of my colleagues, all who were not white, project (and correctly so) that Obama would win.  No, I responded back with a certain sense of assured disdain: “I know my people.”  To make clear, I noted my support for Obama, but I wrestled with the timing: “I know I will live to see the first black president, maybe when I’m 60, hopefully not 80, but not now.  It would be a dream come true though.”  My fellow Americans, dreams come true.

I remained in the cafeteria until after Obama took the oath, noting his hand on a Bible—because that had been part of the backlash against him, a rumor he didn’t place his hand on a Bible when sworn as U.S. Senator.  The anger against Obama as he dared run for U.S. President—and all the spiteful vitriol, never spoken by McCain himself—was palatable and frightening that election year 2008.  I figured it was just angry whites, as I know my people: the very idea, the audacity, of a black man thinking he could be President.  I know the thoughts, the words, the feelings, the expectations and stereotypes against blacks.  I also know or learned how to put those Old South prejudices out of my thoughts.  I worked within a diverse culture.  Doesn’t everyone?  Maybe not.  The schools, after all, were first to be integrated, forcefully by the federal government … before my time.

I’m not sure if memory serves correctly after we all watched President Obama’s swearing in, but I think teachers soon returned to their classrooms.  I noticed the ones leaving were for the most part white.  They were quiet during the ceremonies; perhaps some supported Obama as President.  Then there were some of us white folks who were ecstatic over what had happened, the new era we thought we had been a part of creating.  The African American colleagues were much more jubilant, streaming tears of joy, laughing wholeheartedly as if all their burdens had been rolled away.  I recall the TV camera panning the very lucky Americans who got to witness the Inauguration in person—then in the crowd, the image of Oprah Winfrey, smiling softly.  She’d never appeared so serene.  She had a lot to do with Obama gaining national attention, popularity, and ultimately elected.

Eight years later

During the two terms of President Obama, our nation became obnoxiously divided, loudly hateful in words and manner never witnessed during all the white presidencies.  It might have been egged on by social media and free speech run amuck.  Elected Republicans in Washington, D.C., were NOT going to support any proposal from Obama.  No.  No!!  They were unwilling to work with the executive branch of our government.  This is not how our government works.  Like it or not, our democratic republic works by compromise.  Yes, it does.  Does so.

The 8-year federal legislative stalemate was job Number 1, its intention: To make sure Obama would be a one-term president.  But he wasn’t.  So the vitriol against him and all Democrats escalated, and the heated anger and nonsense turned up to boiling: half the country thinking Obama was the worst president ever, my half thinking he may have been the best president of our lifetime.

As I continued teaching, moving to another school and then another, I was surprised to find by the 2016 election I was in the minority, ethnically yes but this time oddly enough politically.  If politics came up, I found most of my colleagues, well the white and Hispanic ones, were Republicans: gun loving, no social programs, no more immigrants, English language only, pro-life, pro military spending, Christian only and of course lower-my-taxes conservatives.  In short, they were pro-Trump, one after another of my colleagues, down to one or two who still shared democratic ideology.  African American teachers continued to display a poster of Obama, as he was the current U.S. President.  But compared to the national optimism of Inauguration 2008 at the other school, the times had darkened.  All along, I only taught in impoverished neighborhoods with a lot of immigrants in communities where English is not the dominant language.  I learned white people either develop empathy or they don’t.

When everyone returned for the 2016-17 school year, all district faculty and staff had to sign a legal form stating we would not talk politics or openly support either presidential candidate, Republican Donald Trump or Democrat Hillary Clinton.  We also had to watch two short ‘election’ videos, pass assessments and print our certificates.

Wow.

The thrown-together in-house videos demonstrated inappropriate behavior and chitchat between colleagues in the faculty lounge or school hallways.  The point being, for the first time in a presidential election year in which I was a teacher, a district policy was mandated to prevent, prohibit and restrict talk among colleagues about the highly controversial Trump/Clinton presidential election.  It had come to that.  I wondered if any other businesses or corporations were taking such strict measures, making employees sign contracts to abide by a no-talk policy on political opinions including wearing campaign buttons, hanging political posters or maybe donning Trump or Clinton bumper stickers along with other election cycle no-no’s such as using school copy machines for campaign flyers or superiors insisting everyone vote for a certain candidate or support a ballot issue.

Wow.

With every new restrictive employee policy, the issue is about lawsuits.  To avoid potential arguments, fights or intimidation, the school district took this drastic measure, a pre-emptive strike, a gag order, figuratively taping our mouths shut at least during school hours.  The district brass could see the 2016 presidential election was one rotten hot potato, the most divisive in our nation’s history with the most polarizing candidates.  Both Trump and Hillary Clinton were somehow popular and hated at the same time.  How bizarre.

Now we’re in the 2020 Presidential election with the Democrat candidate still unknown and the President remaining wildly popular and intensely revolting depending on who you listen to.  Wonder if the presidential election no-speak policy will spread nationwide to all businesses?  Has America become that kind of country?  If so, we’re no better than those fascist countries around the world, the ones where elections are all show and all fake, where free speech—and governing philosophy is the point of free speech—is suppressed.  We’re seeing that political suppression doesn’t start with a leader’s mandate but with the people’s fear … in this case of losing their jobs.

New York Times misses the ideals & aspirations of middle America, again

Since its formation in the 1850s, the New York Times has been the city’s main newspaper but in modern times has perceived itself as America’s newspaper.  Problem is most Americans don’t feel the same way especially nowadays.  The New York Times, along with CNN, is constantly chided by our current president as fake news.  Truth is the New York Times is about as good journalism as we have in this country.  I check it every day along with The Washington Post, Wall Street Journal and other news sources across the country.  There have been rare moments when the New York Times and even the Washington Post did indeed publish fake news stories.  But at each paper, the culprits were individual reporters: the infamous Jason Blair formerly of the New York Times who wrote pure fiction and got it published in the paper on more than one occasion, and then back in the late ’70s that gal formerly of the Washington Post who inadvertently won the Pulitzer Prize for what turned out to be a fictitious feature series on a child heroin addict.  But other than those two black eyes, these newspapers have kept their nose clean with ensuring real and viable journalism.

So when the esteemed New York Times Editorial Board published its endorsement for the next U.S. President and Vice President, I was pleasantly surprised.  The board of course was not going to endorse a second term for Donald Trump but wrote pleasantries on Democrat presidential aspirants Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg along with a couple of atta-boys for Pete Buttigieg and Andrew Yang.  Then the paper went on to recommend Americans vote Elizabeth Warren as the next U.S. President … and Amy Klobuchar for Vice President!  A capital idea!  Very novel.  Very much with the times.  Not one but two female firsts as President and VP.  I never in my life envisioned such a goal.  Wonder why?  Maybe younger adults have foreseen the possibility.

Front page news

During the 2016 presidential election, the New York Times featured a daily meter on the front page indicating chances of a win by Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.  Hillary was usually 80% and higher, Trump often with as little as 11 points to 20 or so.  And look who won.  And both candidates essentially from New York City.  Boy, were the citizens of New York (City) surprised that their own local-boy-makes-good, the story Trump naturally thought the Times would print but never did … and never will.  The paper does not want to be burned again for printing a story they know their readers would consider fiction.

Shortly after the election, the New York Times editor acknowledged his national media institution was smarting from its dead-wrong prediction.  All smugness gone, the editor decided on a few changes to ensure this sort of thing would not happen again to the New York Times.  The paper had to concede its reporters know nothing of middle Americans, those who live in the vast territory between the two coasts—how they think, how they feel, what they believe collectively.  So the Times would hire scads more reporters who would be stationed throughout the U.S., similar to how the equally longstanding Associated Press reports on the country.  An AP reporter resides in a major city or region for a couple of years, reporting on the important local events before being assigned elsewhere.   The New York Times also was going to expand the religion staff.  Most big city papers have just one person who covers religion and writes about the subject of faith.  The Times’ plan was to hire a few more reporters for a religion staff, each reporter capable of covering specific realms of the world’s major religions.

The 21st century New York Times had to acknowledge in 2016 it did not have its finger on the pulse of the nation, in contrast to its understanding of the coastal elites who ironically included Hillary and Trump.  Maybe this year a presidential election meter will not be featured on the front page of the New York Times or anywhere in the paper.

Not who but when

Getting back to the novelty of two women leading the Free World as U.S. president and vice president, endorsed by the New York Times, both women make the paper’s grade when seeking to build bridges across the nation’s vast mid section: Klobuchar from Minnesota and Warren from Oklahoma.  Klobuchar was the candidate who stood outdoors in falling snow to announce her bid for the White House.  She’s got grit.  Perhaps that should be her motto.  Warren is similar, highly educated and a hero of economic affairs.  She is practical about family budgets and carries that pragmatism into ideals to restructure the national budget, which still is heavily pro-military spending.  She is no-nonsense, thinks like the common man instead of the wealthy, and has real-life experience with family hardship and lost economic dignity.  As for her claim of a smidgeon of Native American ancestry, not only is it true, she looks very much like any white American who claims a tiny bit of Native American heritage.  Both candidates will knock the socks off their Republican contenders (Trump/Pence) in debate.  Smart money is on the women.

Sen. Warren, D-Massachusetts, is 70.  She is married with children from a previous marriage and by now a grandmother.  She had been an esteemed law professor at several universities including the University of Texas at Austin and Harvard.  As the first woman elected to the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts, she served on committees on aging; banking, housing and urban affairs; and health, education, labor and pensions.  Her bachelor’s degree from the University of Houston is in speech pathology and audiology, and she once taught in a public school working with these special-needs students.  But Sen. Warren’s blue-collar childhood in Oklahoma City and Norman, Okla., sets her apart from most who seek the highest office in the land.  Her father worked in sales before a debilitating heart attack. The family never recovered financially.  Her mother, a housewife, had to pick up work as a sales clerk while barely a teen-ager Elizabeth started working as a waitress.  In high school she was an outstanding debater for which she won a college scholarship.  She married, had kids, and the family moved to New Jersey.  After divorcing in the late 1970s, she kept the last name and a few years later married a law professor who is her husband today.     

Sen. Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, is 59.  She is the daughter of a sports reporter and a teacher.  She became a lawyer and later was elected to the U.S. Senate where she gained notice for passing more legislation in one year than her peers.  She is married with a grown child.  She cites a hospital policy for motivation to seek high office.  When her child was born, the hospital allowed only a 24-hour recovery for mother and newborn.  She took the issue to the state which passed a law mandating at least a 48-hour hospital recovery after giving birth, which President Bill Clinton later signed into law making it standard policy across the U.S.

Warren’s platform includes policies on the issues of farmers, opioid crisis, student debt, corporate taxes and big tech regulation.  She has become controversial on her stance for universal healthcare.  She understands something most Americans do not: While half the country works for large industries that provide decent insurance, the other half are self-employed or work for small businesses with no insurance or outlandishly expensive and unaffordable insurance plans.  Klobuchar’s reputation is much more moderate, yet she is pro-choice and supports LGBT rights.

Both ladies … excuse me, women … excuse me again, candidates think ‘Americans first’ when it comes to real family concerns: health insurance, prescriptions, living wages, fair taxes, schools.  Will either Warren or Klobuchar be great presidents or a good team as Prez and VP?  Should anyone care if they are the first women to hold the nation’s two highest offices?  Will it be men against women in the voting booth?  If nothing else, at least in the year 2020 the esteemed New York Times had the wherewithal to endorse these two presidential candidates who happen to be women.  Will the Times’ presidential endorsement matter to those living in America’s heartland?  When it comes to New York City and its snooty newspaper, they’ll likely pay it no mind.

Just talking it over with Death

Hi Death.

Hey.

How’s it goin’?

Oh, same old, same old.

Imagine so.

So, you wanted to see me?

Not really.  OK, no more than anyone else, right?

Right.  I hear from lots of people every day.  What’s the problem?

Just tired, I guess.  I think I’ve seen all this world I wanna see, done all I wanna do.  Nothing to look forward to. I just don’t like the times I live in now.

You sound depressed not suicidal.

Aren’t they the same, I mean, in the end?

Depression is life itself.

Huh.  Death, I never thought of it that way.  Seems we think everything’s supposed to be one big party of happiness, we don’t know how to deal with the long stretches of ‘nothing special going on.’

That’s right.  I hear that a lot … for centuries … since the beginning.  You wouldn’t believe the people I hear from who are alive right now.  They have everything going for them: looks, health, job, family, home, money, lots of things.  And still, they’re just not happy.

I get it.  Guess I always suspected such.  Happiness comes from within.  I should know that by now.

But you forget.  I hear ya.

The older I get, the longer the slumps, the darker the path.  You know what I mean?

Where I’m at, it’s lights out, totally dark.

Oh yeah.

C’mon!  You aren’t ready to be with me.  Cheer up!  You got lots going for you.  I know. Make a list of all the good things you still want to do.

Before you and I go waltzing off into my final sunset?

Yeah!  Always liked your dark sense of humor.  My style.

Takes one to know one.

Then after you check over your list, don’t put off anything because of money or the feeling of no hope for money.  Think more magically.  Or like you think, more mystically.  Envision you living your best life on earth.  And don’t forget to enjoy the gifts—and you have a lot of them— all around you.  Life is lived in the Now.

Mmm.  Very Zen.  You read what I read.

You know me, girlfriend.  I know who I’m talking to.

And remember, you have more to do with the end than I do.  The time, the circumstances, the age, the place.  I just come collecting when you’re ready.  Not the other way around.

See, Death, that’s hard for me to believe.  There are so many who suffer and then die.  I think if they had something to hold on to, like a cure or surgery, they would have endured.  We celebrate that life-affirming story all the time.  That gives us hope, not the other way around, the final goodbye.

You’re looking at this all wrong.  First, life is for learning.  You don’t learn anything during the good times.  Second, no one lives forever.  Third, life is the hardest thing you’ll ever do.

Life is the hardest thing we’ll ever do.  So it’s like we’re doing time on earth, like a prison sentence?

Is that how you wanna think about your time on earth?

Some people live their lives that way.  I never wanted to think of mine as a prison sentence.  I want to be optimistic, but I get down sometimes, especially when things aren’t going my way.

It’s only human.  Don’t beat yourself up.  You’re one of the most optimistic people I know, and I know everybody who is and ever was.

OK, so I’m optimistic, a dreamer, and I’m not the only one.  That doesn’t mean I’m … happy with the way life is going right now.  Sometimes life is harder to live than other times.  It seems there are roadblocks, personality conflicts, situations I am not in control of.

Where’d you get all that psycho babble?  In control?  Life is like one long crazy roller coaster ….

OK, OK.  I get the metaphors about life.  I think my problem is more about society, American society, modern times, media, social media—my era.  The message engrained since maybe TV, color TV, is how neat and clean life should be, could be, can be.  My generation and my parents’ and the younger ones have spent most of our lives watching life: dramas and comedies, characters, other times, other places. Wait. That’s it!  Isn’t it, Death?  That’s the reason for a collective depression: spending the majority of our waking hours watching other people do stuff.  That’s the problem!  And it leads to overwhelming sadness within each of us.

Well, that’s very insightful.

And the best thing is we can solve it!  Just monitor our time spent ‘watching’ life and spend most of our time ‘doing’ life! Wow, I’ve had an epiphany, don’t you think?  And, I owe it all to you.  Death, you are the best listener a human can have.

OK, I wouldn’t go that far.

No, no, really, people should appreciate you, how close you are to each of us, with us like a shadow each and every day we live and breathe.  Why, you’re nothing to fear at all!

Now, hold on, I have a reputation to maintain.  I like a little fear in my human beings.

Yeah, but the fear leads most of us to keep on living, to choose life!  Oh, how life affirming a talk with Death can be!

Shhhh!  See YOU later.

Much later! (Wink)