21st century: blowing & going

From the year 2000, we are now completing the first quarter of the 21st century. But, hey, it’s a lot like we’re living in the 1920s: the roaring fun years, the money years, the kick-up-your-legs dancing years, the wicki wicki wacki woo music, the cars, the annoying horns, the rumble seats, the phones, the movies, the bigger-than-life sex symbols on the silver screen, the celebrity double entendre, lotsa photos of smiling high times, hypocritical prohibition, sweet marijuana, ruthless gangs, the Tommy guns, the jazz lingo, the loose morals, the short dresses, the eye makeup, the bobbed hair, the raccoon coats, and the ukes.

A hundred years later, it’s like Fast Times at 21st Century High.

We can’t even recall exactly when we started burying our faces in our smart phones. Or when parents’ kids started calling them dumb phones.

But we very quickly changed as a society for the better and for worse. As a human race, we agreed to go along for the ride that is the 21st century.

Tech replaced the Space Age known to the Baby Boomers. Briefly around the 1990s, the Space Age was replaced by the Information Age—thought to be the most significant achievement in the history of mankind and sure to open the world to democracy and the benefit of FREE SPEECH. But that Age has morphed into a horrible, dangerous and anti-democracy Disinformation Age and purposefully ruinous Misinformation Age. That is our Age now.

Nevertheless, I offer the following retrospective of our times so far:

The good things about living in the first quarter of the 21st century

Y2K averted—the much-feared and over-publicized worrisome turn-of-the-century transfer of vast computerized data controlling everything from banks to bombs to municipal water and sewer systems, each computer system created ages ago and presumed to expire December 31, 1999; no one knows how it all worked out without a hitch (but we thought the world could come to an explosive end)

The Human Genome Project—international scientists broke the code of life to uncover future medical breakthroughs benefiting mankind

World Wide Web/AKA the internet—allows everyone access to vast information and history, even encyclopedias, books, sound recordings, film and video

Federal budget balanced—by the Clinton Administration; no one ever thought such a thing possible, but it happened and left an enormous surplus

Facebook—an internet novelty that ushered in social media and mainly allowed people to seek long lost friends, loved ones, and even re-unite broken families

Barack Obama elected U.S. President in 2008 AND 2012—our first Black president, no assassination to this date

Robotics—commonly used in more industries, even something called ‘soft botics’ small patches placed on human bodies for healing while digitally providing data to doctors

Smart Boards—replaced the classroom’s old blackboard and whiteboard by connecting the internet with touch-screen effects, making learning fun and relevant to students already more tech-savvy than many of their teachers and parents

iPhone—the internet in the palm of your hand

Computerized cars—operating with tens of thousands of chips, features include self-driving and self-parking

Amazon—buy anything your heart desires, delivered from the company’s gigantic storage facilities

Neo burials—fewer graves, more cremation plus the latest trend toward bio graves that replenish the earth

Drones—uses of which are just starting to be seen

Store-to-home/office—delivery services

Marijuana—more states legalizing the wacky weed; for generations, possession and distribution were considered crimes punishable by prison; President Biden recently released everyone serving federal marijuana sentences and pardoned thousands at the state level

Work from home (thanks Covid-19) many former office workers sent home to work during the pandemic ain’t returning to their cubicles or offices but still will work … online

Bi-racial families—Live and let live for the growing number of citizens marking the U.S. Census as being ‘more than one race’

Hybrid and at long last electronic cars—can go a few hundred miles on a single charge

Wind power—thousands of acres of windmills seen countryside produce clean energy

Fast cash—send money online bank to bank to friends and family whenever wherever

Women almost elected U.S. President—two highly qualified women win the Democratic Party nomination in 2016 and 2024

Streaming services: watch movies, TV shows, news, music and games at home any time

Financial upswing—uncanny and incredulously lingering robust financial times

The bad things about living in the first quarter of the 21st century

9/11—September 11, 2001, NYC, USA, two commercial airplanes highjacked by terrorists flown directly into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, killing close to 3,000 people and devastating life, commerce and air travel around the world for weeks and months

Two “forever” wars—instigated by the U.S. in retaliation for the 9/11 attacks and fought in Afghanistan and Iraq; costing trillions of dollars, a billion a day in the early years; ending in 2009 and 2021; the REASON Americans are angry about government and their personal finances and present and future quality of life

The Great Recession of 2007-2009—millions lost their jobs and endured salary cuts

Tech bust—tens of millions unemployed

Opioid crisis—pain killer prescription authorized by doctors leading to perpetual addiction of 10 million and unintended deaths of hundreds of thousands

Housing crisis—ongoing and growing homeless people on the streets of cities, suburbs and small towns

2016 Democratic and Republican Convention fights—both parties hotly disputed controversial nominees, finally agreeing on Donald Trump (R) and Hillary Clinton (D)

Social media interference with U.S. presidential election 2016—U.S. proved Russia intentionally posted numerous false reports against Democratic presidential candidates including Obama and Clinton

Fake news—proudly coined by President Trump, refers to longstanding traditional newspapers and TV news such as CNN and The New York Times; the term used to refer to notorious tabloid news filled with unsubstantiated and always scandalous stories about celebrities or dubious science

Abortion illegal again—following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, half the states banned the procedure even for rape and incest

Q-Anon—What? Was? That?

Increased school shootings—the number was 40 in just 2024

Daily mass shootings—at every single place where lots of people gather: churches, grocery stores, malls, parks, concerts, movie theaters, nightclubs, restaurants; 488 mass shootings in just 2024

The internet—unregulated like America’s Wild West has become overrun with made-up stories and images

Parents charged with child’s mass school shooting—about time

Illegal immigration—worldwide and due to intolerable and deadly living and economic conditions in many countries; number touted in the U.S. is at 11 million

Closing rural hospitals—not enough business to pay the bills, according to healthcare experts

Increasing cost of healthcare and health insurance—deductibles unaffordable to most families

Decline of the daily newspaper—even online editions, a twist to the old adage “All politics is local”

Pandemic or its mishandling—included worldwide panic, forced business/industry and school closures, forced quarantines, required masks everywhere, social distancing, culminating in school closures for a year and a half not to mention long Covid sufferers and increased anxiety among kids

Youth suicide—numbers are heartbreaking; blame on social media and online peer bullying

24-hour news cycle—enough already; most of the time spent analyzing and predicting news instead of reporting it

Cost of higher education—graduates revolting, Biden administration forgiveness for some hotly debated

Fracking—causing earthquakes in diverse places like Texas and Oklahoma

Women presidential candidates—in 2016 and 2024 but do not win

Americans elect convicted felon as U.S. President in 2024—lowering a standard

Profanity—accepted in popular songs and culture

Teacher shortages—caused by massive layoffs connected to the Great Recession and massive retirements and resignations during the pandemic

Gun sales unprecedented—upon Obama’s election and Congress allowing the expiration of the federal ban on assault rifles, the preferred gun in successful mass shootings

Ghost guns—built with special 3-D printers and totally untraceable by law enforcement

Climate Change—yeah, we all agree now that it’s really real.

Which leaves us to what we have to look forward to or regret: Artificial Intelligence, facial recognition, designer babies, skies darkened by drone traffic, and free countries voting in authoritarian leaders to quash democratic ideals and illegal immigration—the worse-case scenario being World War III.

On an optimistic note … why aren’t we flying in our own sky cars by now?

Insurance CEO shooting backlash: inappropriate, honest, sad commentary on America’s healthcare system

Murder is immoral and a crime punishable by prison and execution. But … wow wee, Americans have taken to making public their stories of being screwed (excuse me), er, treated very badly by their health insurance companies. And all us Americans understand exactly the extreme anger expressed in millions of social posts responding to the intentional shooting death of a major healthcare provider CEO. If we haven’t experienced a screwing (excuse me), er, a very bad experience whereby we who are insured still end up paying thousands and tens of thousands of dollars for required medical treatment and hospitalizations, we all know someone who has.

So in this country, being angry about our medical healthcare insurance is well known going back to the days of TV’s Donahue. The story goes there was a golden moment shortly after World War II when our nation considered going the way of Western Europe and other modern nations like war-torn and totally defeated Japan by creating universal healthcare. Since then, all their citizens never have to choose between life-saving prescriptions and surgery or like many of us living in the U.S.: pass on medication and treatments because we can’t afford it. That is our common story, our peculiar unique frustrating lives whenever we get sick: What to do and how to pay for it?

Instead the good old boys of the 1940s representing us in the U.S. Congress decided to keep health insurance tied to employment. The rich and powerful have always believed NOT in the decent, hard-working American. No, they must come from families who no doubt had at least one lazy good-for-nothing uncle who would rather not work for a living. The bottom line was keeping health insurance as a benefit for only the employed. Make that the gainfully employed. Part-timers don’t count along with the unfortunate unemployed. Yeah, life’s tough. Get a job.

Earlier this century, President Obama’s priority for universal healthcare was due to the national finding that catastrophic illness is the number one reason why Americans lose their homes. But we know how extremely, and unnecessarily, controversial that whole universal healthcare debate was. The President had to go to the Supreme Court time and again to pass what amounted to the Republicans’ counter healthcare revisions now known as Obamacare. And still Americans are unhappy with their healthcare coverage (still tied to our jobs), the increasing deductibles over a career of working, the fear of losing their life savings due to chronic medical illness or injuries from, say, a car crash.

Work and pray

There are tales about the 1960s when congressional Republicans fought tooth and nail against Medicare (universal healthcare for old people) and Medicaid (universal healthcare for poor people). But the measures passed anyway thanks to LBJ. In the 1990s, universal healthcare was a top priority of President Clinton but couldn’t be passed—not with feuding among every sector of the healthcare industry (doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and insurance providers) blaming each other and refusing to … compromise. Yeah, that’s how things get done in government. And why would healthcare providers want to compromise? Follow the money.

A big compromise discussed was salaries and in this country money paid by healthcare providers in lawsuits and lawsuit insurance coverage. In the early 1990s, a national study on earnings of professionals in the healthcare industry (doctors, hospital administrators, pharmaceutical CEOs, research scientists, and insurers) was made public as well as suggested reduced salaries that would make healthcare more affordable. The figure for physician earnings was $400,000, compared to the study’s suggested annual salary of $200,000. That was a long time ago, the 1990s. In this country, people that go into healthcare, the number one industry this century, don’t choose it because they love people. Money, big money, salaries that 99 percent of us would never dream of, is a factor. We get it. Perfectly understandable. We’re all Americans here. Money’s our thing. The rest of the world sees us as people who care more about money than anything else. Are they wrong?

Then we hear about how healthcare works in other modern nations like Canada, Great Britain and Japan. First, doctors there do not earn anywhere near what their counterparts earn in the U.S. Nowadays we can investigate online instead of asking someone who lived or lives in nations with universal healthcare. The Michael Moore movie Sicko, about our convoluted and broken healthcare system compared to the better managed systems in France and England, was enlightening … and infuriating … and by now forgotten by Americans today. In those countries, people didn’t pay for the birth of a baby, life-saving brain surgery, cancer treatments, even home healthcare for elderly and temporarily disabled people.

At the heart of the nations across our world that long ago opted for universal healthcare is their value of human life. Those countries think a human should be saved if at all possible, that every person has worth in their societies, that everybody has the right to be healthy physically and emotionally and therefore productive, that the human masses do not exist for the benefit of the nation or corporations but just the opposite: corporations and nations exist for the benefit of citizens.  

These are big lofty ideals, called idealistic by fiscal conservatives, called freeloading by the crass who don’t want to take the time and energy to fix our healthcare system—that nobody likes no how.

But universal healthcare, which I’ve always believed in because it exists all around us in nations an ocean away and even within our shared hemisphere, is as important as life itself. Is it not? How to make it work in the U.S.? It’s possible. It’s always been.

WWPS do?

So I was buying a sheet of Pete Seeger stamps at the U.S. Post Office the other day … What? I seem just like the type of lib who uses stamps honoring an American treasure like folk singer Pete Seeger? Actually, I was searching for Billie Holiday stamps or any musical stamps (since music is my passion). But the only music stamp was an illustration of Seeger singing while playing his trademark banjo.

And I started thinking about what would Pete Seeger do if he lived in these times, given our latest presidential election of a convicted felon awaiting sentencing for almost three dozen crimes plus the civil sexual assault conviction culminating in millions of dollars still owed his victim? Seems Americans are willing to go with any man who’s had a TV show and been on the screen so many decades now that everyone feels like he’s family.

Long ago I determined as an old person when it came to world affairs, I wanted to carry on like Kurt Vonnegut, Arthur Miller, Larry King, and the old-school reporters on classic “60 Minutes”: crusty but wise, fine detectors of bull$&^*, able to call a spade a spade. Wow, the freedom they had, the bravery, the willingness to risk all for what they knew to be truth, justice and right. They all lived through World War II—the worst modern event to have happened to humanity and the planet—and to their dying breath they always believed (no, they knew): The world keeps spinning. We the people carry on. I would put Seeger in this high echelon of famous Americans worth admiring and emulating.

In the past few weeks, along with half the country’s population, I indeed shed tears over the loss of yet another first woman U.S. president. And more tears over having to live through another Trump reign. He never acted like a U.S. president (one who knows he’s one of the people) but prefers to be treated like a king.

That right there just chaps my hide.

And so it also would anger Americans who know the U.S. presidency to be part of a governing trio that everyone understands will ‘check and balance’ each other. In this country, no governing entity is a higher authority than the others: judicial, executive and legislative branches. That’s how we learned it in school. But the incoming president doesn’t go for that historical and unique concept. He only proves that some businesspeople with no background in government operations (or basic law), especially American democracy that absolutely permits and puts up with the watchful eye of the press, should be president ever.

Waist Deep in the Big Muddy

That anti-war song by Pete Seeger was banned on radio and TV in the 1960s and even had something to do with a major network canceling “The Smothers Brothers” show which would feature Seeger’s performance of the song. It was based on Seeger’s knowledge of WWII when he served Uncle Sam as an entertainer. He knew war and therefore was against the Vietnam War. He was anti-war period.

Seeger, whose father was an educated musicologist who preserved folk music, was raised in a comfortable Eastern U.S. family. Traveling with his father while exploring folk music, young Pete asked for a banjo, and that started his own musical exploration and enthusiasm with folk music. Along the way, he would befriend not only Woody Guthrie but Bob Dylan and maintain lifelong friendships with both innovators and poetic observers of 20th century American life. Being a political radical from the Great Depression—and rather a famously unabashed one—he was called in to name names before HUAC, the House Un-American Activities Committee, that went after American commies or Democrats or liberal thinkers. As did playwright Arthur Miller, Seeger eloquently told the committee he didn’t recognize their authority and stood by his constitutional right to free speech which included free thinking. His guilty verdict was overturned years later, and he was awarded the National Medal of Arts by President Bill Clinton.

There were those who did not support Seeger, a known commie, being awarded an American medal for anything. But Clinton was a Seeger fan and admirer. Didn’t matter what Seeger’s political affiliation was. Free thinkers, people, Americans who allow others to think what they want and believe what they want are always outsiders. They can form groups and organizations and now meet online and vent like I do here. But … they’ll always be outnumbered for it is so much easier to just go along with the crowd whether political or religious. It’s just easier for people to get along if their opposing beliefs and thoughts are … kept to themselves.

My heroes above would say “Horse$#!+!”

So for now as 2024 turns into the first quarter of the 21st century, it seems we Americans still find ourselves living in a time remarkably known and experienced by my heroes mentioned above like Seeger, Vonnegut and Miller. We who are still here must accept it’s always been … and always will be.

Pete Seeger sings Waist Deep in the Big Muddy.

Bing Videos

What the *&^%$ happened!?!!

Lily white is not where I work. Lily white is not where I live. I’m not sure where all the white people are at this point, presuming that was a major voting bloc for returning President Donald Trump to power. But I can say in my chats with first-generation Americans—who come from other lands like Central and South America, Africa and the Middle East—that they tend to be Republican. Just something I noticed. And this election, Arab Americans in particular were choosing Trump over VP Kamala Harris due to the U.S. pro-Israel policy regarding war-torn Gaza.

People say the economy is why Trump won handedly or why Harris lost. I understand completely. Everything costs so damn much now with no sign of prices restored to pre-pandemic levels. We haven’t experienced a pandemic like the Covid-19 worldwide health crisis, so who knows how long it takes for prices to come down? We’ll find out. Still, President Joe Biden’s economy is proven resilient, even stronger than when Trump was President. But obviously, the majority of American voters remain unconvinced and are hurting economically in the home … where it counts most.

I started this political humor and social commentary blog a month after Trump was elected as U.S. President in 2016—so shocked was I he won. And the way he won. All brass and no class. Lots of repeated lies and histrionics. Calling straight-up news organizations ‘fake news’ and the tabloids ‘real news.’ And just plain meanness, like making fun of a disabled reporter. Gosh. Not to mention cozying up to Russian leader Vladimir Putin. But the majority of Americans voted Trump in. Actually, his opponent Hillary Clinton received 3 million more votes. But Trump won the Electoral College. This time around, he won quickly and with the popular vote. It was a stunning victory all around. Republicans didn’t think he’d win. Neither did Democrats. Neither did the mass media.

By now the people don’t trust the American news media at all with their puffed-up predictions and polls. The news media had an approval of maybe 30 percent, and now forget about it. The media blew it again with all their assured projections which the public actually believed. None of them thought Trump would win again. All of them insisting the economy is robust. (And ironically it is.) But Americans aren’t fooled by the high cost of living, their struggles to make ends meet, their living too close to financial ruin month after month.

I know. I blame corporate greed for the high cost of products. I realize prices have gone up, even doubled and tripled, and never have come down for everything including rent and mortgage, hospitalization, prescription drugs, insurance, bills for power and gas, and fuel for our cars. And why aren’t prices going down … by now? [I’ll be suspicious if prices miraculously come down after Trump takes office.]

Democrats have changed. So have Republicans.

Another theory on why Trump won has to do with something called elitism, that Democrats are thought of as educated and overly educated, smug and pretentious, earning the big bucks, living cushy lives in McMansions, and definitely ignoring the ‘little people.’ I cannot believe I’ve lived to see the day that Democrats are considered the party of the elite and Republicans are thought of as the ones who aren’t too proud to roll up their sleeves and help the common man. It’s what the American people think based on last week’s election. It’s as extreme a political reversal as when both parties switched when Blacks were given civil rights in the 1960s. OK, so Americans now see Republicans as the political party that cares for the working man. I remain unconvinced—as unconvinced as the majority voters are with Democrats supporting measures to assist their struggle with high prices.

But given how Trump won in 2016 and now again in 2024, I theorize (sorry for using a pretentious word)—all right, to rephrase: I’m thinking there’s something going on with the human brain and circular logic. It is the stuff of cults.

I’m just mouth agape over what’s happened to the majority of people I know, from beloved family to friends, neighbors and colleagues. In my nonwhite neighborhood and work world, the overwhelming majority of people are Republican. I understood the growing switch from Democrat to Republican back in the 1990s as the issues of concern were wasteful government spending, taxes, social conservatism, Christianity, abortion, and if you can believe it Presidential character. In those days, communities across the U.S. that used to be Democratic strongholds converted one by one to Republican. It was a movement that started with the mass appeal of President Ronald Reagan in 1980.

And this Republican majority, whether true believers or just voting for Trump again for what it’s worth, watch Right-leaning Fox, America’s number one choice with 25 percent of all news watchers. It didn’t matter that Fox lost a defamation lawsuit and had to spend close to a billion dollars for repeatedly lying about the 2020 presidential outcome to support Trump’s claim against voting machines and rampant fraud.

The 2020 election was judged to be our most secure in history with the same said about 2024. So the machines are not malfunctioning (and they did at the turn of the century as I experienced).

And illegals could never vote to begin with along with lots of dead people. So those were other lies from 2020 and cleared by the 2024 election.

There was always a fear in politics that more people were drawn to “extreme” Right and Left. That’s worth pondering. Republicans who are wholeheartedly in with Trump denounce the party actually and proclaim themselves MAGA. Who knows what that means, but apparently immigration, all right illegal immigration—because it’s still legal for humans to come to this country to live—was the burning factor, the one big topic of interest that bonded tens of millions of Americans together.

Back to Democratic elitism, it’s not as insulting as it is just … stupid. Talking heads may articulate policy flaws and desires whether Republican or Democrat. But to base an entire historical American political party as the New Elites is not true. And yet we who call ourselves Democrats must come across as thinking we’re better than everybody else. I’ve been told that a few times. Me, one who practices self-deprecating humor, the first one to insult myself before anybody else gets a chance. The point is people who did have the opportunity to go to college (on work-study programs and government loans and grants as I did) don’t think they are better than people who did not and could not attend or finish college.

Elitism describes a minority of Americans across both Republican and Democrat parties. What they have in common is wealth and the ability to live ‘above’ the masses in a way that keeps them from seeing and experiencing what’s really going on down here where 99 percent of us live and work. Elites do not know or care about the majority of Americans’ fear of financial ruin and the squeezing of the middle class. President Joe Biden and VP Harris were not born with silver spoons in their mouths. They came from typical middle-class and working-class families. They earned the opportunity for college and made their way in life. The same cannot be said about Trump.

The fact remains the majority of American voters agreed to look the other way when it comes to Trump and all that we already know about how he rules and how he wants to rule our country. They overlooked the fact that he’s awaiting sentencing for his serious felony conviction involving dozens of flat-out crimes associated with his first run for the presidency. His long speeches and tiredness that came across as mini strokes or dementia were lauded by his fans and of no concern to the majority of voters this time around. His enemies’ list and remarks about killing journalists and others who practiced their Constitutional right of free speech were perceived by the majority of voters as nothing more than tough talk, nothing to take seriously.

Not to sound pretentious or too edumacated, but in time when the future generation studies us, they will wonder many things: about our hypnotic need for phones and instant information, a people who adhere to only their own beliefs whether political or religious and never study opposing views, who overeat mindlessly and do not care for their bodies, who have many guns for protection just in case, who could not vote into the Presidency two qualified women and instead one time chose a convicted criminal, who swing like a pendulum between electing one party then the other every four to eight years. But the future generation will know more about brain health that can be detrimental when only consuming media that repeatedly tells us what we already think. Future citizens will know this creates circular logic and brain disease. And they’ll understand us better than we are willing to understand what we’ve done to ourselves at this point in time in American history.

Power of the Press fading fast

During the 2000 Bush/Gore election, I was on the editorial board of a small Texas newspaper. I also was the government reporter, covering local, state and national news and every election. Near November the editorial board met to choose political endorsements. We had endorsed in races from the county to U.S. legislators and this year had to decide between George W. Bush or Vice President Al Gore for U.S. President. We knew Bush as our Texas governor for a few years. I had covered the state long enough to know that every one of his four campaign goals was already set in motion whether he won or lost to Gov. Ann Richards. Bush even came to town where I was a reporter. The personal visit was a big plus when papers decided on endorsing a candidate, especially if he or she sat down with the editorial board. Bush popped in to talk to the newspaper editor and publisher. That day we workers were told to stay at our desks and not get up until the Governor and Presidential candidate left the building. He walked in at the appointed time and waved at us in the newsroom. I smiled and waved back. I’d interviewed Gov. Bush several times.

Who would the editorial board choose: Bush or Gore? The editorial board consisted of five members. Two were Republican, and three of us were Democrats. So knowing everything there was to know at that time about Bush and Gore, we voted, and Gore would be endorsed by the newspaper.

But the next day, the publisher decided the newspaper should endorse Bush. He had been our governor after all. He was like family. The publisher had called newspapers across the state and found all were endorsing Bush. Perhaps he worried we’d be on 60 Minutes having to explain why we were the only Texas newspaper not endorsing Bush for President. We didn’t have a reason other than the majority of us on the editorial board were Democrats. But the three of us were in the news biz and could think for ourselves. Bush was friendly and all but never seemed to fit the big boots of Governor of Texas. We who were Democrats disagreed with his business, social and environmental policies at the expense of millions of disenfranchised Texas families. We came to that conclusion from working the state to local angles of new policies, from which we developed our opinion and endorsement.

The editor talked to the other two Democrats on the editorial board, which included yours truly. He refused to write an editorial supporting Bush. So did the other Democrat. I had no problem writing up a glowing endorsement of Bush. I’m a writer. I can write any angle whether I believe it or not. Covered many stories about issues I personally do not support. So I used my first-hand knowledge of Bush plus his campaign brochures and got to writing. No one would ever know I was the one who wrote the Bush editorial endorsement.

A quarter century later, our nation—which enshrined freedom of the Press into our Constitution—not only has significantly fewer newspapers but this year even fewer that will endorse for U.S. President, evading altogether to choose either Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump.

News you used to use

The news biz is not what it used to be and is visibly unsure of its future existence and present purpose or relevancy. ‘Who’s reading?’ is the question, always been. Now people prefer news sources that promote their political beliefs whether Left or Right. And the news business has evolved into commentary-heavy instead of predominantly news, which it should be. Broadcast news channels are 95 percent commentary and five percent news.

See, the public thinks news people constantly talking about politics is arrogant.

Even during my years in newspapers, starting in the 1980s, I always sensed a doom-and-gloom built into the once proud and illustrious newspaper industry. Still, I persevered. Some of us reporters were natural writers. Writers are always observing everything, asking questions, and then writing about it. Journalists, however, are supposed to report news. We investigated, researched and studied our story ideas so that what we wrote, what was printed and published, was accurate sans bias.

I object to the assumption that journalists can never report on people who’ve experienced ordeals they haven’t. A writer can do it and does it all the time and has throughout history. Have you read classic novels or a play or watched a good movie?

Fear is the reason newspapers like The Washington Post and LA Times shamefully shirked their expected duty to endorse a Presidential candidate. They fear hostility by millions of Americans not to forget the well-known contempt of the media by one of the Presidential candidates. When it came to endorsing Harris and Trump, these papers figured rightly “Damned if you do. Damned if you don’t.” But the decision to avoid a Presidential endorsement altogether was chicken. Reporters quit over it.

NEWSpapers should have endorsed one presidential candidate over the other. It’s not arrogance but an informed opinion for the record and posterity that the public should know whether they care or not—and future generations should know about Presidential endorsements, too. The media has access to candidates and vice versa. Citizens do not.

Arrogance is the perception the public has of the media, newspapers and reporters. I disagree but as a reporter interviewed enough folks to understand where they’re coming from—lives with many hardships, few options or paths for improvement, feeling powerless as if their lives don’t matter—then I’d write about it.

It’s not who you’re voting for; it’s how you’re voting

I voted early. (Did my part to get’er in Office.) Like I felt in 2016, I was proud to finally get to vote for a woman President. That hardly ever happens. We’ll see if more than 50 percent of American voters feel like I do.

And unlike 2016, I voted with one issue in mind: Abortion. Abortion. Abortion.

It should have NEVER been made illegal like it was long ago, two generations ago, before I was old enough to know it used to be against the law and females used hangars or trusted their most private body parts to anyone (usually men for some reason) who said they could end an unwanted pregnancy for a few bucks (and sometimes other favors). Not in the year 2023. Not with all the modern medical science we as a First World country live with and are guided by, trusting tough and crucial decisions based on our face-the-facts knowledge presented to us by doctors. Not when our neighbor Mexico and other long-time-coming progressive nations are finally seeing the light and going the way the U.S. did in 1973 by legalizing abortion.

Look, this election is going to be based on one issue: the economy. But hardly mentioned—as to not ruffle the feathers of the angry, loud, know-it-all, nosy, controlling, manipulative, judgmental, hypocritical and interfering anti-abortion crowd—is restoring pregnancy choice to women and girls, restoring THEIR privacy in this matter as Law of the Land. Instead, we have to deal with this ridiculous backwoods outcome of a piecemeal pattern that occurred among the states as soon as Roe was overturned by the current U.S. Supreme Court courtesy of Trump’s three appointees who lean against allowing half the U.S. population to determine their future.

A human right was taken away. But it only impacted women and girls.

And not all that many Americans, the ones who support abortion, especially when deemed medically necessary, are up in arms about it. But we should be.

We’re all sisters

Starting with a woman’s right to choose, now that that is removed or made close to impossible, that is and always has been an economic decision. And in America, let’s face it, more than half the women pregnant are unmarried and will end up taking care of the babies themselves. That does not mean the fathers aren’t paying child support. They are now that it is really uncool and illegal not to pay. But couples aren’t getting married or even living together just because they are expecting a baby. The bottom line that only women know is how children’s needs and health mostly involve the mothers who must take time off work and are not financially compensated by employers. Rich people know nothing about this economic problem. Middle class has a good idea about it but can manage with grandmothers and others helping out. But poor women, who do not earn a livable wage to begin with let alone enough money to provide for their children, can get caught up in a downward economic cycle.

Then there are the statistics about miscarriage, which by the way is the next level of control that those who call themselves pro-life advocates in office (every one of them men) are looking into. They want a list of every woman and girl who’s suffered a miscarriage. Why is that? What are they wanting to do: strap her to a public whipping post in the town square? The reason they want a list of females who’ve miscarried is because these men, who got themselves elected to public office, actually believe females are to blame for their miscarriages. What a bunch of morons. We’re talking about men here; OK, OK, just some men. And actually, that’s another point: Thank God, we’re talking about only a very few men—but they are damn powerful, too big for their britches. Hey: WE HAVE BIGGER PROBLEMS THAN ABORTION AND MISCARRIAGE.

The statistics about miscarriage (a nonmedical term meant to be a comforting euphemism created by society because doctors still call a miscarriage an abortion—a pregnancy that’s been aborted by nature/God or physician) is 30 percent of all pregnancies. However, most miscarriages occur in the first weeks to three months of pregnancy when females may be unaware they’re pregnant. So the stats could be as high as 50 percent. Whether 30 or up to half of all pregnancies ending in miscarriage, it is a HUGE number. Only men—OK, a certain type of men (creeps)—would try to control females who’ve had a miscarriage. It’s as if men of this ilk really think women go out dancing and partying when they’ve miscarried. No, only women know this, but many are depressed to suicidal over having a miscarriage. Only an idiot would not sympathize with her. Send her a card, flowers, something instead of adding her name to a government list to be harassed and investigated.

Men have a lot to do with abortion

The most important reason I still support abortion on demand in THIS country is because … when it comes to molestation, it’s not one in four girls. It’s one in three. Those are our statistics here in America.

With all that molestation, there’s gotta be a lot of unintended pregnancies. And many states like Texas do not allow abortion for incest and rape.

Why is that?

Why does my state and others give men the right to impregnate girls [I know rape is illegal, but our society can’t stomach discussing this problem] and then force the girls to give birth?

Haven’t the victims of this common yet unspeakable traumatic crime suffered enough?

Why is it that men are calling the shots on this issue, a complex situation involving male power and little girl innocence, that male legislators can’t comprehend or imagine because they’re so—God, what’s the word for a sex who would do this to the other sex?

Ah, sexism is the reason. God gave Eve to Adam for one reason: and to this day, there are men who still believe women are good for only one thing and two if producing more human beings.

There is something twisted and, well, nasty about all this anti-abortion legalese. Male legislators are involved. Lawyers are involved. People who think they are followers of Jesus Christ are involved. Hell, everyone’s involved except for girls who’ve been sexually abused and women who may have the same story or as U.S. citizens have the right to think their bodies are their private domain. Even doctors don’t know what to do with a pregnant woman experiencing a life-or-death situation, which is not uncommon at all.

It is life.

And the fact, that apparently only women know, is: When it comes to life, no one’s in control, buddy.

Weight loss: Only in my dreams. Sigh.

When I see myself in my dreams, I am always lithe, the perfect size—not fat at all—for some deep twisted joke’s-on-me psychological reason. ’Cause when I awake and plant my feet on the ground every morning, I’m still the same overweight heavy person I’ve been most of my life, many decades now on the planet … with lotsa gravitational pull I’ve found on my aging body.

Like most Americans, it’s close to 75% of us at this point, we who are deemed obese, weighing way more than we ought, I pay attention every time a new miracle weight-loss formula comes along. This time it’s an injection originally for all those Americans with Diabetes II, the type of diabetes that we bring upon ourselves, the one we can prevent for the most part with some willpower and self-discipline. And lo and behold, this injection has shown to work. Everyone in Hollywood is on it. And now our friends and family, too. It’s as if we’ve been told we can eat what we want and take an injection to lose weight and prevent gaining weight.

Pardon me as I remain skeptical, even joking that we’ll learn in time this weight-loss drug makes your stomach fall out your rectum. Funny, huh? Well, it came to mind because of a weight-loss drug in the 1990s that made people’s hearts pump backwards or something. And then there have been so many weight-loss fads (eat only protein), pills (that dissolve fat), surgeries (binding your stomach to the size of a thumb). Why not wear a tight belt?

Meanwhile, I just continue trotting along with some sort of healthy diet and exercise. I’d say today for the most part, I eat better and with greatly reduced calories than I’ve ever eaten my whole life, after Noom reinforced my psyche (for two years; I’m a slow learner) to watch the calories and type of food and reasons for eating. Yes sir, on weekdays I awake at 4 a.m. and get with it at the gym. I’ll admit to skipping the past couple of months due to a severe foot sprain. And as usual when I am forced to go without exercise, I lost six pounds. Wha? Maybe that heavy boot I had to lug around, walking heavily and peculiarly like a suspicious disabled character in a David Lynch movie, gave me some fat-burning exercise.

Diet and exercise. Yeah, right

I have been a regular at local health clubs since I was 21, when I originally got into it during the Jane Fonda hopping craze and heard that women on birth control pills can gain weight. I did NOT want that to happen. I did real good: exercised hard and used weight machines only three times a week and cut calories like a good girl. No sweets. No cheating. Just a half cup of cereal with skim milk for breakfast. Half a sandwich and an apple for lunch with a Diet Coke. Only a tablespoon of vegetables like potatoes, corn and green beans for dinner. No dinner rolls. No butter. A candy bar only once a month. Man was I disciplined … way back then. And it was quite successful. Wish I weighed that 120 pounds today. Sigh.

Do you know when I did lose weight back then, not only did no one notice, but I still felt like the fattest person on earth? My legs, butt and abdomen were still big compared to my female peers and the ones on TV. The first place I lost weight was the bust. But why did I ‘feel’ fat? It’s because in those days, the doctor charts said someone my short stature should weigh 100 pounds. And then a nurse told the nation everyone should weigh 15 percent less than our ideal weight; we’d be healthier that way. So for little ol’ me, er, I mean short me, I should weigh 85 pounds? That was then, the 1980s.

This is now, a century later. Don’t think I haven’t noticed through the years those medical weight charts increased for some reason, allowing me to weigh up to 140 or so. One time I came in less than the chart, having worked very hard to eat only healthy food and exercise heavily after work at night. But … life … has been hard, harder some years than others. All right, it’s been nothing but hard year after year, decade after decade. Sigh.

Epiphany: The weight is emotional! Maybe that’s why I’m lithe in my dreams!

In recent years, I’ve also noticed my various doctors don’t even tell me to lose weight anymore. Never mention it. That’s all I heard them say when I was a chubby kid, self-conscious teen-ager and young to middle-aged woman. Maybe now as a senior citizen, they’ve given up on me. I’ve survived this long with all this weight. I’m still alive and relatively healthy (compared to others my age). I know the score for my generation. I still exercise, and docs tell me hardly anyone exercises.

But feeling as I do about still being overweight, that I need help of some sort, I’ve approached my doctors about weight-loss drugs. (Psst. I believe they’re called amphetamines.) Nothing doing! My docs are not going to allow me to take prescription weight-loss drugs. WTH? One doc told me flatly: Losing weight is VERY HARD, practically impossible. (I knew it!) The trick, see, is to NEVER GAIN THE WEIGHT TO BEGIN WITH. Damn. Damn it all to  hell.

The weight-loss shot originally for diabetics (that is supposed to help their pancreas do what it can no longer do due to diabetes) is so desired right now by everybody that the FDA is having to ensure its availability. Americans are the only people on earth who want what we want when we want it.

And let’s face it, that’s the reason we’re so fat to begin with.

Twenty years of living in & loving my old house

Nacogdoches is where I learned to appreciate old houses, really old houses from 19th century Victorian to Queen Anne: large covered porches furnished for sitting outside rain or shine, a foyer with a second entry door so the interior of the house stays warm during cold weather, squeaky wood floors and fireplaces with grand or rustic mantels, large rooms with tall ceilings, steep stairs and dark corners, cedar chests and antiques used by modern families in the 1980s. Fresh from a childhood within a suburban concrete jungle and urban sprawl, from the 1970s when as a know-nothing kid I assumed ‘new and improved’ and ‘bigger is better,’ I grew into a young adult who learned to respect old things like antiques and old houses. Always wanted a Tudor design with rounded doors or a cozy cottage—most significantly: built before World War II. The quality is visible with every detail such as molding and craftsmanship. All I knew before venturing into the Piney Woods was cramped cookie-cutter houses, laid out almost bureaucratically in dozens of rows as far as the eye could see. They were built practically overnight when the men came home from the war (and started making the Baby Boomers).

In 2003 I started looking for my first house, my own piece of Texas. It took a year, but I finally decided on a prairie-style brick home, pier-and-beam, with front porch pillars, built in 1946. Close enough. Wood floors throughout and the original windows, with ropes, that can hardly open without a few knocks on the frame. It was modernized with central heat and AC, utility ‘mud room,’ converted two-car garage to spacious carpeted bedroom with bath, and a new amp box with more than sufficient power as we use a lot more electricity than families in mid-20th century.

A very, very, very old house

When my husband and I first moved from apartment life into our first house, we stayed in the back bedroom, the one that had been the two-car garage in the ’50s. I think it was because the cable wasn’t connected in the living room for a couple of weeks. But the truth is we didn’t know how to spread out and LIVE in our very own house. Soon he started gardening, planting all sorts of flowers and vegetables and grape vines, and laying down grass to grow in the backyard. The front yard was already covered in clover with two huge oak trees! I love it.

The first thing I did once officially moved into the house, with a good-size wood-fenced backyard, was visit the animal shelter for a dog. I brought home the smallest they had, a 19-pound black and tan dachshund mix named Susie. She was one year old and big for a dachshund. I thought a dog and an alarm system would ensure security. Our former apartment was broken into a year prior, and all the important things were stolen.

When I move into a new place, I stay up late at night and play some of my favorite music while decorating my new home. Here I strategically placed above the fireplace a Picasso print, The Three Musicians. It goes well there, the Harlequin’s outfit in the painting matches perfectly the tile décor around the fireplace.

When my parents drove down for Thanksgiving in our new home in 2004, I rushed to Walmart to buy whatever curtains would go with the house, choosing an off-white plain curtain underneath a sheer tan material decorated with leaves and vines. An aunt who traveled with my parents complained my old house was too drafty. I gave her a blanket to wrap around her shoulders and tried to move her away from the window. I’ve learned to live quite comfortably in my old house. The AC and heating system work fine. Just wear more clothes in the winter and less in the summer.

That first year, whenever it rained, we had to place lots of big buckets and cook pots in the fireplace and other areas wherever a new roof leak occurred. Spent years getting roofers to patch the roof. Got the chimney sealed too to prevent water from pouring into the fireplace.

When our house turned 60 in 2006, we threw a big party. I played music from each decade: starting with the Big Bands then country swing, early rock n roll, Texas garage bands from the ’60s, then disco and the latest pop and country. A long-time elderly neighbor from across the street stopped by to see what was going on in our house. She was 90 and when she saw it was a party for the house, she returned with a big pot of home-made beans she’d been cooking all day. When she passed away a few years later, I picked up her American flag from the estate sale. We installed it on the front porch for patriotic celebrations even though it was tattered.

During those early years of home ownership, I shopped for items needed like floor lamps, shelves and a leather chair and sofa. I was keen on furniture that fit the age of the house. My parents, who also appreciate old houses, gave me a couple of antiques that fit this house perfectly: a cherry wood buffet and a blond wood vanity. Both feature a curved mirror.

I’ve hung pictures from our various world travels, presenting them in the dining area—which we never really used unless for company. A good twenty years of apartment life runs deep; we never did stop sitting in front of the living room TV while eating our food on separate standing trays.

Old house, take a look at my life

As homeowners we were responsible for all maintenance and repairs. That first night in our new house, we had to call an electrician because the power suddenly went out. He crawled underneath the house and fixed something that got disconnected. A couple years later, I had the house thoroughly inspected and was told it was in pretty good shape for a house built in 1946. The home inspector enjoyed going through this old house. He understood why it was built the way it was. The history of the house is a physician had it built and lived here for decades until death. Then his daughter kept the house for rental property. In the early 2000s, a renovator bought it then flipped it to us. I loved the textured olive walls of the living and dining areas. 

One time the AC didn’t work. The repairman reported one of our dogs, Tommy, chewed through an important wire probably thinking it was a grass snake which he liked to catch in the backyard. Another time, a neighbor on a walk just happened to notice a constant water stream from the grassy median in front of our house. We called the city, thinking it was their problem to fix. We were wrong. The water bill was more than $1,000. We had to replace the front water line, with insurance paying a share, and I had to send the bill to the city to show we paid to repair/replace our water line before the bill would be reduced.

A few years later in the dead of winter, we had to replace the original sewer line. The clay pipe was stamped 1946. The front yard had to be dug out to install the modern pipe that supposedly will not crack or break from tree roots, the source of our problem. Well, what’cha gonna do? We’re not chopping down the oak trees. That would be a sin.

There was another winter we spent with racoons in the attic. We heard a racket every night at dusk, like a big party was going on right above our heads. I heard something above the bedroom ceiling and small footsteps walking across. We opened the attic, turned on the light, and were met with several pairs of eyes, two were babies. We couldn’t do anything about it. We called an animal removal business, and they came out and placed some humane cages with marshmallows because racoons love marshmallows. That night, we heard the family entering again and then the cage closed. We caught one. We called the service to remove it, but no one would venture out because it was February and all the roads were iced. It stayed that way for several days. Susie the dog went berserk, knowing a racoon was just a few feet above her in the living room. She took to climbing the walls with pained howling. We had to move a bookcase to keep her off the walls. We kept her out of the living room, too. Finally the captured racoon was removed, looking sad its party in our attic had come to an end. We were advised to keep the tree limbs trimmed and the house plugged up so that sort of thing won’t happen again.

A day before moving into this house, when I knew it belonged to me, I took some sage and set it afire till it smoked. Then I walked through every room and blessed it, all who enter and live here. Through the years with all the strange and unexpected things that have occurred in and around my house, I’ve slept well at night. My husband recuperated from cancer here as well as from other illnesses and surgeries. We both recuperated from Covid here. We’ve watched the children of our neighbors grow into adults. We bonded together during the pandemic and when our dogs grew to old age and needed a lot of assistance such as an IV drip for renal failure. One cold night close to Christmas, all us neighbors stood on my big front porch and somberly watched a house across the street burn while firefighters worked to put it out. Our fire station is only a minute or two away. Every year we were big supporters of Halloween and enjoyed handing out candy to all the little creatures who dared ring our doorbell. We were sad when another longtime neighbor, a recent widow and good friend, decided to sell her modest house across the street and move away from Dallas. Her home was worth an amount she never could have imagined when purchased three decades ago.

I have fought the tax appraisal board only once, and we agreed on a reduction. Property taxes remain a shocking surprise every year. I suppose the inspectors notice improvements like a new roof, storage shed, paint job, wood fence, AC unit, not to mention the new water and sewer lines buried beneath the yard and 21st century water heater. I don’t know what they base the appraisal and tax figure on, but I’ve been told it’s not about the house or its condition but more about the property lot, one with two huge oak trees. I figure after selling this old house—where I installed an original iron Texas heritage marker at the front door—it may be razed and a similar yet modern house built in its place. I understand. Everything changes, and we live through many evolutions. So many improvements and necessities as we proceed in this century, an old home may not suffice. Still, living in my old house (granted, easier in summer than winter) has enriched my life as I knew it would. It’s been an honor calling this place my home for the past twenty years.

Y’all headin’ to the Texas State Fair (where guns may or may not be permitted)?

I don’t go to the Texas Fair every year, you know, because it’s so expensive. But I was looking forward to attending this year for a concert on the Main Stage, the singer pretty much a hometown gal with a cool music style. So I thought I’d hang out a couple hours, ride some rides, eat the latest faire, then catch the evening show.

I’d been looking forward to this evening out for months, even wrote it on my calendar. Then I heard about the sudden and bizarre interference by the State of Texas. They took Texas State Fair to court over its official gun ban. That’s right: Only Texas would ban a gun ban. Or try to. The Texas State Fair, which is a nonprofit business and not an operating entity of state or city government, announced an official gun ban. This was due to the shooting last year. And wasn’t it around the last day of the fair? And didn’t the shooting happen in the overcrowded food court, a place under one roof? That scared off fair goers and made Texas out to be the Wild West of state fairs. Yee-hah!

Fair officials no doubt were mortified by the shooting (not to mention the liability). And all the rest of us wondered how did anybody sneak a gun into the fairgrounds. Well, if you just think about it, you can figure it out. Criminals know how to sneak in guns using only the bodies God gave them.

A shooting at the fair—a vibrant community unto itself which for people watchers had always been an entertaining and lively scene with the occasional risqué—was bound to happen given decades of unchecked gun proliferation. And bang! Bang, bang, bang! It happened—right among the baby strollers and diapered toddlers, their older siblings, parents, kinfolk and neighbors who ventured into Fair Park for just one day after traveling the metroplex and from all the little towns and cities across this state ironically named for being friendly.

The shooting, not at all shocking—I mean, come on—managed to kinda shut down our beloved state Fair. More than one generation of Texans, whether at the Fair or not, are traumatized for life, never to go to our state fair again.

Texas, we gotta problem

Poor Texas State Fair officials. Surely, they thought the most reasonable thing to do was implement and proudly announce a gun ban on fair premises.

Not in this state, buster. Try it, and you’ll be saw-ree. Our state government sues over such bans, dontcha know?

Poor Fair officials. Thought Texas allows businesses to decide for themselves if’n they’ll permit people with guns to enter their premises.

Sounds like some Yankee suits were a-tinkering with the great State Fair of Texas by implementing some sort of ‘gun control.’ In these parts, those fightin’ words.

What’s crystal clear among the blatant hypocrisy, bully tactics and fat-headedness that aptly describes our state’s top elected officials nowadays is they don’t give a bloody ’dillo about ensuring safety for tens of millions of Texas fairgoers—and instead come across as highly encouraging everybody and anybody to bring a gun to the Texas State Fair this year.

That’s the clear and dangerous message courtesy of the State of Texas. Confused young people with access to guns along with others whose delusions of grandeur are out of control (Texas doesn’t care about the mentally ill either, preferring the old 1870s adage: Pull yourself up by your bootstraps) have received the very loud and public call to show up at the Texas State Fair armed. Like it’s a mighty proud longstanding Texas tradition to carry guns everywhere.

Ironically, Texas shot itself in the foot taking the State Fair’s gun ban to court—because the latest ruling sides with Fair officials: No guns allowed.

For now.

Guess we’ll just have to dare go to the Texas State Fair … and hope for the best. Eh, it’s the 21st century. Aren’t we used to living this way already … everywhere we go?

Childless adults have always made everybody uncomfortable

I should know. For whatever reasons, I never had children. So, sue me.

And now this private matter has become a scolding stick by the political Right. When my colleagues find out I do not have children, their reaction has always been first one of sympathy and second a remark meant to be comforting, like “You’re better off.” Then they tell me the problems they’re having with their adolescents, serious ordeals I’m glad I don’t have to deal with. Child rearing is the hardest job in the world, I think we all can agree. After all, Oprah Winfrey (also childless) said it several times on her TV show. As a teacher, I suppose I know a lot more about kids and teens than my childless contemporaries who work in occupations that do not involve dealing with kids on a daily basis.

But more than one school principal has asked me point blank, “Are you a parent?” Like this means anything. The implication being that only parents make the best teachers. Allow me this one brutally honest clarification: Teaching and Parenting are not the same thing.

In fact, my feminist sisters assured me that a prospective boss or employer cannot ask our (women’s) parental status. They said it’s downright illegal. Nevertheless, it happens. Still. And come on, get over it. That boat has sailed. Maybe my figure looks like a woman who’s bore a few children. So it’s an assumption … made only by male supervisors. What’s up with that? Women supervisors never ask me if I have children. And male supervisors never ask men if they’re parents. So, childless is a sexist adjective. It is intentionally meant to insult and break us presumed emotionally frail women who’ve never reproduced. There was a time when people felt sorry for women who never had children or couldn’t have children. Those days are gone. Ehhh, we don’t need their pity anyway.

And that’s another problem with the Right: Women like me, who’ve never given live birth, aren’t ‘Marilyn Monroe’ about it. We’re not all emotionally broken, harboring a deep secret sorrow throughout our entire lives, on the verge of tears, feeling incomplete as women because we never became mothers. Instead, we carry on as career women (who are, more often than not, also mothers). Not having children is sad to a point, but in this country, I thought, work and career are most important. Look at how the U.S. treats mandatory time off after giving birth, still letting each business call the shots by offering a few weeks to a few months—then it’s get back to work. Compare with Germany that provides both mothers and fathers up to three years off after the birth of a baby. Now as a teacher, I can attest, that’s more like it. The first three years of a child’s life are the most important in overall emotional, physical and psychological development. The U.S. is so far behind on this human right.

They made Murphy Brown have a baby

The difference between women and men is we have a biological clock. Tick tock. Tick tock. We’re keenly aware of the best age to reproduce (our 20s). And if we miss it, it’s gone. Only the wealthy have access to additional methods to try to create a new life, one being in vitro fertilization. But wait, the Right has problems with that method (because it involves abortion).

A couple of decades ago, it was a woman’s choice to reproduce or not. There are many reasons why some women don’t have a baby already. Has the Right forgotten about genetics, miscarriages, still births, and myriad things that can go wrong with mother and/or unborn baby during pregnancy? Pregnancy is all about the gray in life, the uncertainties, never the assurance of a perfect healthy baby. It is a huge risk for some women. To know each woman’s reason for not having children would be heartbreaking—to people who have hearts.

When I was a single career gal in my 20s and 30s, I watched TV shows with characters relating to my lifestyle, like “Seinfeld,” “Cheers” and “Murphy Brown.” The latter intrigued me because I was a news reporter, and Murphy Brown was a TV journalist based in Washington, D.C. She was the consummate career woman who worked her way up from the 1960s covering every kind of story, mostly politics. But way after she was in her 40s, she became pregnant. And she made the decision to not marry the father but have the baby. It was a decision heard round the world because Vice President Dan Quayle made a big Republican deal about it, calling this decision, by a fictitious TV sitcom’s character, inappropriate and falsely influencing young girls to do the same. (Almost half of all American girls and women who give birth are unmarried, and it’s been this way since the 1980s.)

The “Murphy Brown” premise didn’t wash with me either. I knew the network suits made TV’s Murphy Brown have a baby to bring a contrived family angle. It was like the baby didn’t belong in Murphy’s world of political banter, investigative journalism, and high-pressure national TV news. It was strange. Yet most of my work colleagues in the news biz had children, managed to do their jobs and raise kids. If it were me, I don’t know what I would have done. But that was and still is how I’ve always seen my life and careers: as a service to mankind because I don’t have children.

In closing, let me point out the one fact that has been unspoken in American politics since the Clinton administration: Teen pregnancy is the number one reason for lifelong poverty. And it’s generational: A teen mother who has a child she cannot afford often becomes a grandmother of her teen daughter’s child that they both can’t afford, and so on. See, not every female will opt for abortion even if it’s legal. But the majority of teen mothers will remain in poverty for the rest of their lives. Their opportunities are few, their future bleak, their self-worth diminished. This is true for both mother and child(ren). Poor kids are the ones I teach.

It’s a lot to ask of every woman in this country: Get busy having babies. What may be a piece of cake to most women is not for everyone. And most importantly, to have or not to have children is a woman’s private matter; no one’s business; and, despite the Right’s assumption, not political—not in the slightest.