Power of the Press fading fast

During the 2000 Bush/Gore election, I was on the editorial board of a small Texas newspaper. I also was the government reporter, covering local, state and national news and every election. Near November the editorial board met to choose political endorsements. We had endorsed in races from the county to U.S. legislators and this year had to decide between George W. Bush or Vice President Al Gore for U.S. President. We knew Bush as our Texas governor for a few years. I had covered the state long enough to know that every one of his four campaign goals was already set in motion whether he won or lost to Gov. Ann Richards. Bush even came to town where I was a reporter. The personal visit was a big plus when papers decided on endorsing a candidate, especially if he or she sat down with the editorial board. Bush popped in to talk to the newspaper editor and publisher. That day we workers were told to stay at our desks and not get up until the Governor and Presidential candidate left the building. He walked in at the appointed time and waved at us in the newsroom. I smiled and waved back. I’d interviewed Gov. Bush several times.

Who would the editorial board choose: Bush or Gore? The editorial board consisted of five members. Two were Republican, and three of us were Democrats. So knowing everything there was to know at that time about Bush and Gore, we voted, and Gore would be endorsed by the newspaper.

But the next day, the publisher decided the newspaper should endorse Bush. He had been our governor after all. He was like family. The publisher had called newspapers across the state and found all were endorsing Bush. Perhaps he worried we’d be on 60 Minutes having to explain why we were the only Texas newspaper not endorsing Bush for President. We didn’t have a reason other than the majority of us on the editorial board were Democrats. But the three of us were in the news biz and could think for ourselves. Bush was friendly and all but never seemed to fit the big boots of Governor of Texas. We who were Democrats disagreed with his business, social and environmental policies at the expense of millions of disenfranchised Texas families. We came to that conclusion from working the state to local angles of new policies, from which we developed our opinion and endorsement.

The editor talked to the other two Democrats on the editorial board, which included yours truly. He refused to write an editorial supporting Bush. So did the other Democrat. I had no problem writing up a glowing endorsement of Bush. I’m a writer. I can write any angle whether I believe it or not. Covered many stories about issues I personally do not support. So I used my first-hand knowledge of Bush plus his campaign brochures and got to writing. No one would ever know I was the one who wrote the Bush editorial endorsement.

A quarter century later, our nation—which enshrined freedom of the Press into our Constitution—not only has significantly fewer newspapers but this year even fewer that will endorse for U.S. President, evading altogether to choose either Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump.

News you used to use

The news biz is not what it used to be and is visibly unsure of its future existence and present purpose or relevancy. ‘Who’s reading?’ is the question, always been. Now people prefer news sources that promote their political beliefs whether Left or Right. And the news business has evolved into commentary-heavy instead of predominantly news, which it should be. Broadcast news channels are 95 percent commentary and five percent news.

See, the public thinks news people constantly talking about politics is arrogant.

Even during my years in newspapers, starting in the 1980s, I always sensed a doom-and-gloom built into the once proud and illustrious newspaper industry. Still, I persevered. Some of us reporters were natural writers. Writers are always observing everything, asking questions, and then writing about it. Journalists, however, are supposed to report news. We investigated, researched and studied our story ideas so that what we wrote, what was printed and published, was accurate sans bias.

I object to the assumption that journalists can never report on people who’ve experienced ordeals they haven’t. A writer can do it and does it all the time and has throughout history. Have you read classic novels or a play or watched a good movie?

Fear is the reason newspapers like The Washington Post and LA Times shamefully shirked their expected duty to endorse a Presidential candidate. They fear hostility by millions of Americans not to forget the well-known contempt of the media by one of the Presidential candidates. When it came to endorsing Harris and Trump, these papers figured rightly “Damned if you do. Damned if you don’t.” But the decision to avoid a Presidential endorsement altogether was chicken. Reporters quit over it.

NEWSpapers should have endorsed one presidential candidate over the other. It’s not arrogance but an informed opinion for the record and posterity that the public should know whether they care or not—and future generations should know about Presidential endorsements, too. The media has access to candidates and vice versa. Citizens do not.

Arrogance is the perception the public has of the media, newspapers and reporters. I disagree but as a reporter interviewed enough folks to understand where they’re coming from—lives with many hardships, few options or paths for improvement, feeling powerless as if their lives don’t matter—then I’d write about it.

It’s not who you’re voting for; it’s how you’re voting

I voted early. (Did my part to get’er in Office.) Like I felt in 2016, I was proud to finally get to vote for a woman President. That hardly ever happens. We’ll see if more than 50 percent of American voters feel like I do.

And unlike 2016, I voted with one issue in mind: Abortion. Abortion. Abortion.

It should have NEVER been made illegal like it was long ago, two generations ago, before I was old enough to know it used to be against the law and females used hangars or trusted their most private body parts to anyone (usually men for some reason) who said they could end an unwanted pregnancy for a few bucks (and sometimes other favors). Not in the year 2023. Not with all the modern medical science we as a First World country live with and are guided by, trusting tough and crucial decisions based on our face-the-facts knowledge presented to us by doctors. Not when our neighbor Mexico and other long-time-coming progressive nations are finally seeing the light and going the way the U.S. did in 1973 by legalizing abortion.

Look, this election is going to be based on one issue: the economy. But hardly mentioned—as to not ruffle the feathers of the angry, loud, know-it-all, nosy, controlling, manipulative, judgmental, hypocritical and interfering anti-abortion crowd—is restoring pregnancy choice to women and girls, restoring THEIR privacy in this matter as Law of the Land. Instead, we have to deal with this ridiculous backwoods outcome of a piecemeal pattern that occurred among the states as soon as Roe was overturned by the current U.S. Supreme Court courtesy of Trump’s three appointees who lean against allowing half the U.S. population to determine their future.

A human right was taken away. But it only impacted women and girls.

And not all that many Americans, the ones who support abortion, especially when deemed medically necessary, are up in arms about it. But we should be.

We’re all sisters

Starting with a woman’s right to choose, now that that is removed or made close to impossible, that is and always has been an economic decision. And in America, let’s face it, more than half the women pregnant are unmarried and will end up taking care of the babies themselves. That does not mean the fathers aren’t paying child support. They are now that it is really uncool and illegal not to pay. But couples aren’t getting married or even living together just because they are expecting a baby. The bottom line that only women know is how children’s needs and health mostly involve the mothers who must take time off work and are not financially compensated by employers. Rich people know nothing about this economic problem. Middle class has a good idea about it but can manage with grandmothers and others helping out. But poor women, who do not earn a livable wage to begin with let alone enough money to provide for their children, can get caught up in a downward economic cycle.

Then there are the statistics about miscarriage, which by the way is the next level of control that those who call themselves pro-life advocates in office (every one of them men) are looking into. They want a list of every woman and girl who’s suffered a miscarriage. Why is that? What are they wanting to do: strap her to a public whipping post in the town square? The reason they want a list of females who’ve miscarried is because these men, who got themselves elected to public office, actually believe females are to blame for their miscarriages. What a bunch of morons. We’re talking about men here; OK, OK, just some men. And actually, that’s another point: Thank God, we’re talking about only a very few men—but they are damn powerful, too big for their britches. Hey: WE HAVE BIGGER PROBLEMS THAN ABORTION AND MISCARRIAGE.

The statistics about miscarriage (a nonmedical term meant to be a comforting euphemism created by society because doctors still call a miscarriage an abortion—a pregnancy that’s been aborted by nature/God or physician) is 30 percent of all pregnancies. However, most miscarriages occur in the first weeks to three months of pregnancy when females may be unaware they’re pregnant. So the stats could be as high as 50 percent. Whether 30 or up to half of all pregnancies ending in miscarriage, it is a HUGE number. Only men—OK, a certain type of men (creeps)—would try to control females who’ve had a miscarriage. It’s as if men of this ilk really think women go out dancing and partying when they’ve miscarried. No, only women know this, but many are depressed to suicidal over having a miscarriage. Only an idiot would not sympathize with her. Send her a card, flowers, something instead of adding her name to a government list to be harassed and investigated.

Men have a lot to do with abortion

The most important reason I still support abortion on demand in THIS country is because … when it comes to molestation, it’s not one in four girls. It’s one in three. Those are our statistics here in America.

With all that molestation, there’s gotta be a lot of unintended pregnancies. And many states like Texas do not allow abortion for incest and rape.

Why is that?

Why does my state and others give men the right to impregnate girls [I know rape is illegal, but our society can’t stomach discussing this problem] and then force the girls to give birth?

Haven’t the victims of this common yet unspeakable traumatic crime suffered enough?

Why is it that men are calling the shots on this issue, a complex situation involving male power and little girl innocence, that male legislators can’t comprehend or imagine because they’re so—God, what’s the word for a sex who would do this to the other sex?

Ah, sexism is the reason. God gave Eve to Adam for one reason: and to this day, there are men who still believe women are good for only one thing and two if producing more human beings.

There is something twisted and, well, nasty about all this anti-abortion legalese. Male legislators are involved. Lawyers are involved. People who think they are followers of Jesus Christ are involved. Hell, everyone’s involved except for girls who’ve been sexually abused and women who may have the same story or as U.S. citizens have the right to think their bodies are their private domain. Even doctors don’t know what to do with a pregnant woman experiencing a life-or-death situation, which is not uncommon at all.

It is life.

And the fact, that apparently only women know, is: When it comes to life, no one’s in control, buddy.

Weight loss: Only in my dreams. Sigh.

When I see myself in my dreams, I am always lithe, the perfect size—not fat at all—for some deep twisted joke’s-on-me psychological reason. ’Cause when I awake and plant my feet on the ground every morning, I’m still the same overweight heavy person I’ve been most of my life, many decades now on the planet … with lotsa gravitational pull I’ve found on my aging body.

Like most Americans, it’s close to 75% of us at this point, we who are deemed obese, weighing way more than we ought, I pay attention every time a new miracle weight-loss formula comes along. This time it’s an injection originally for all those Americans with Diabetes II, the type of diabetes that we bring upon ourselves, the one we can prevent for the most part with some willpower and self-discipline. And lo and behold, this injection has shown to work. Everyone in Hollywood is on it. And now our friends and family, too. It’s as if we’ve been told we can eat what we want and take an injection to lose weight and prevent gaining weight.

Pardon me as I remain skeptical, even joking that we’ll learn in time this weight-loss drug makes your stomach fall out your rectum. Funny, huh? Well, it came to mind because of a weight-loss drug in the 1990s that made people’s hearts pump backwards or something. And then there have been so many weight-loss fads (eat only protein), pills (that dissolve fat), surgeries (binding your stomach to the size of a thumb). Why not wear a tight belt?

Meanwhile, I just continue trotting along with some sort of healthy diet and exercise. I’d say today for the most part, I eat better and with greatly reduced calories than I’ve ever eaten my whole life, after Noom reinforced my psyche (for two years; I’m a slow learner) to watch the calories and type of food and reasons for eating. Yes sir, on weekdays I awake at 4 a.m. and get with it at the gym. I’ll admit to skipping the past couple of months due to a severe foot sprain. And as usual when I am forced to go without exercise, I lost six pounds. Wha? Maybe that heavy boot I had to lug around, walking heavily and peculiarly like a suspicious disabled character in a David Lynch movie, gave me some fat-burning exercise.

Diet and exercise. Yeah, right

I have been a regular at local health clubs since I was 21, when I originally got into it during the Jane Fonda hopping craze and heard that women on birth control pills can gain weight. I did NOT want that to happen. I did real good: exercised hard and used weight machines only three times a week and cut calories like a good girl. No sweets. No cheating. Just a half cup of cereal with skim milk for breakfast. Half a sandwich and an apple for lunch with a Diet Coke. Only a tablespoon of vegetables like potatoes, corn and green beans for dinner. No dinner rolls. No butter. A candy bar only once a month. Man was I disciplined … way back then. And it was quite successful. Wish I weighed that 120 pounds today. Sigh.

Do you know when I did lose weight back then, not only did no one notice, but I still felt like the fattest person on earth? My legs, butt and abdomen were still big compared to my female peers and the ones on TV. The first place I lost weight was the bust. But why did I ‘feel’ fat? It’s because in those days, the doctor charts said someone my short stature should weigh 100 pounds. And then a nurse told the nation everyone should weigh 15 percent less than our ideal weight; we’d be healthier that way. So for little ol’ me, er, I mean short me, I should weigh 85 pounds? That was then, the 1980s.

This is now, a century later. Don’t think I haven’t noticed through the years those medical weight charts increased for some reason, allowing me to weigh up to 140 or so. One time I came in less than the chart, having worked very hard to eat only healthy food and exercise heavily after work at night. But … life … has been hard, harder some years than others. All right, it’s been nothing but hard year after year, decade after decade. Sigh.

Epiphany: The weight is emotional! Maybe that’s why I’m lithe in my dreams!

In recent years, I’ve also noticed my various doctors don’t even tell me to lose weight anymore. Never mention it. That’s all I heard them say when I was a chubby kid, self-conscious teen-ager and young to middle-aged woman. Maybe now as a senior citizen, they’ve given up on me. I’ve survived this long with all this weight. I’m still alive and relatively healthy (compared to others my age). I know the score for my generation. I still exercise, and docs tell me hardly anyone exercises.

But feeling as I do about still being overweight, that I need help of some sort, I’ve approached my doctors about weight-loss drugs. (Psst. I believe they’re called amphetamines.) Nothing doing! My docs are not going to allow me to take prescription weight-loss drugs. WTH? One doc told me flatly: Losing weight is VERY HARD, practically impossible. (I knew it!) The trick, see, is to NEVER GAIN THE WEIGHT TO BEGIN WITH. Damn. Damn it all to  hell.

The weight-loss shot originally for diabetics (that is supposed to help their pancreas do what it can no longer do due to diabetes) is so desired right now by everybody that the FDA is having to ensure its availability. Americans are the only people on earth who want what we want when we want it.

And let’s face it, that’s the reason we’re so fat to begin with.

Twenty years of living in & loving my old house

Nacogdoches is where I learned to appreciate old houses, really old houses from 19th century Victorian to Queen Anne: large covered porches furnished for sitting outside rain or shine, a foyer with a second entry door so the interior of the house stays warm during cold weather, squeaky wood floors and fireplaces with grand or rustic mantels, large rooms with tall ceilings, steep stairs and dark corners, cedar chests and antiques used by modern families in the 1980s. Fresh from a childhood within a suburban concrete jungle and urban sprawl, from the 1970s when as a know-nothing kid I assumed ‘new and improved’ and ‘bigger is better,’ I grew into a young adult who learned to respect old things like antiques and old houses. Always wanted a Tudor design with rounded doors or a cozy cottage—most significantly: built before World War II. The quality is visible with every detail such as molding and craftsmanship. All I knew before venturing into the Piney Woods was cramped cookie-cutter houses, laid out almost bureaucratically in dozens of rows as far as the eye could see. They were built practically overnight when the men came home from the war (and started making the Baby Boomers).

In 2003 I started looking for my first house, my own piece of Texas. It took a year, but I finally decided on a prairie-style brick home, pier-and-beam, with front porch pillars, built in 1946. Close enough. Wood floors throughout and the original windows, with ropes, that can hardly open without a few knocks on the frame. It was modernized with central heat and AC, utility ‘mud room,’ converted two-car garage to spacious carpeted bedroom with bath, and a new amp box with more than sufficient power as we use a lot more electricity than families in mid-20th century.

A very, very, very old house

When my husband and I first moved from apartment life into our first house, we stayed in the back bedroom, the one that had been the two-car garage in the ’50s. I think it was because the cable wasn’t connected in the living room for a couple of weeks. But the truth is we didn’t know how to spread out and LIVE in our very own house. Soon he started gardening, planting all sorts of flowers and vegetables and grape vines, and laying down grass to grow in the backyard. The front yard was already covered in clover with two huge oak trees! I love it.

The first thing I did once officially moved into the house, with a good-size wood-fenced backyard, was visit the animal shelter for a dog. I brought home the smallest they had, a 19-pound black and tan dachshund mix named Susie. She was one year old and big for a dachshund. I thought a dog and an alarm system would ensure security. Our former apartment was broken into a year prior, and all the important things were stolen.

When I move into a new place, I stay up late at night and play some of my favorite music while decorating my new home. Here I strategically placed above the fireplace a Picasso print, The Three Musicians. It goes well there, the Harlequin’s outfit in the painting matches perfectly the tile décor around the fireplace.

When my parents drove down for Thanksgiving in our new home in 2004, I rushed to Walmart to buy whatever curtains would go with the house, choosing an off-white plain curtain underneath a sheer tan material decorated with leaves and vines. An aunt who traveled with my parents complained my old house was too drafty. I gave her a blanket to wrap around her shoulders and tried to move her away from the window. I’ve learned to live quite comfortably in my old house. The AC and heating system work fine. Just wear more clothes in the winter and less in the summer.

That first year, whenever it rained, we had to place lots of big buckets and cook pots in the fireplace and other areas wherever a new roof leak occurred. Spent years getting roofers to patch the roof. Got the chimney sealed too to prevent water from pouring into the fireplace.

When our house turned 60 in 2006, we threw a big party. I played music from each decade: starting with the Big Bands then country swing, early rock n roll, Texas garage bands from the ’60s, then disco and the latest pop and country. A long-time elderly neighbor from across the street stopped by to see what was going on in our house. She was 90 and when she saw it was a party for the house, she returned with a big pot of home-made beans she’d been cooking all day. When she passed away a few years later, I picked up her American flag from the estate sale. We installed it on the front porch for patriotic celebrations even though it was tattered.

During those early years of home ownership, I shopped for items needed like floor lamps, shelves and a leather chair and sofa. I was keen on furniture that fit the age of the house. My parents, who also appreciate old houses, gave me a couple of antiques that fit this house perfectly: a cherry wood buffet and a blond wood vanity. Both feature a curved mirror.

I’ve hung pictures from our various world travels, presenting them in the dining area—which we never really used unless for company. A good twenty years of apartment life runs deep; we never did stop sitting in front of the living room TV while eating our food on separate standing trays.

Old house, take a look at my life

As homeowners we were responsible for all maintenance and repairs. That first night in our new house, we had to call an electrician because the power suddenly went out. He crawled underneath the house and fixed something that got disconnected. A couple years later, I had the house thoroughly inspected and was told it was in pretty good shape for a house built in 1946. The home inspector enjoyed going through this old house. He understood why it was built the way it was. The history of the house is a physician had it built and lived here for decades until death. Then his daughter kept the house for rental property. In the early 2000s, a renovator bought it then flipped it to us. I loved the textured olive walls of the living and dining areas. 

One time the AC didn’t work. The repairman reported one of our dogs, Tommy, chewed through an important wire probably thinking it was a grass snake which he liked to catch in the backyard. Another time, a neighbor on a walk just happened to notice a constant water stream from the grassy median in front of our house. We called the city, thinking it was their problem to fix. We were wrong. The water bill was more than $1,000. We had to replace the front water line, with insurance paying a share, and I had to send the bill to the city to show we paid to repair/replace our water line before the bill would be reduced.

A few years later in the dead of winter, we had to replace the original sewer line. The clay pipe was stamped 1946. The front yard had to be dug out to install the modern pipe that supposedly will not crack or break from tree roots, the source of our problem. Well, what’cha gonna do? We’re not chopping down the oak trees. That would be a sin.

There was another winter we spent with racoons in the attic. We heard a racket every night at dusk, like a big party was going on right above our heads. I heard something above the bedroom ceiling and small footsteps walking across. We opened the attic, turned on the light, and were met with several pairs of eyes, two were babies. We couldn’t do anything about it. We called an animal removal business, and they came out and placed some humane cages with marshmallows because racoons love marshmallows. That night, we heard the family entering again and then the cage closed. We caught one. We called the service to remove it, but no one would venture out because it was February and all the roads were iced. It stayed that way for several days. Susie the dog went berserk, knowing a racoon was just a few feet above her in the living room. She took to climbing the walls with pained howling. We had to move a bookcase to keep her off the walls. We kept her out of the living room, too. Finally the captured racoon was removed, looking sad its party in our attic had come to an end. We were advised to keep the tree limbs trimmed and the house plugged up so that sort of thing won’t happen again.

A day before moving into this house, when I knew it belonged to me, I took some sage and set it afire till it smoked. Then I walked through every room and blessed it, all who enter and live here. Through the years with all the strange and unexpected things that have occurred in and around my house, I’ve slept well at night. My husband recuperated from cancer here as well as from other illnesses and surgeries. We both recuperated from Covid here. We’ve watched the children of our neighbors grow into adults. We bonded together during the pandemic and when our dogs grew to old age and needed a lot of assistance such as an IV drip for renal failure. One cold night close to Christmas, all us neighbors stood on my big front porch and somberly watched a house across the street burn while firefighters worked to put it out. Our fire station is only a minute or two away. Every year we were big supporters of Halloween and enjoyed handing out candy to all the little creatures who dared ring our doorbell. We were sad when another longtime neighbor, a recent widow and good friend, decided to sell her modest house across the street and move away from Dallas. Her home was worth an amount she never could have imagined when purchased three decades ago.

I have fought the tax appraisal board only once, and we agreed on a reduction. Property taxes remain a shocking surprise every year. I suppose the inspectors notice improvements like a new roof, storage shed, paint job, wood fence, AC unit, not to mention the new water and sewer lines buried beneath the yard and 21st century water heater. I don’t know what they base the appraisal and tax figure on, but I’ve been told it’s not about the house or its condition but more about the property lot, one with two huge oak trees. I figure after selling this old house—where I installed an original iron Texas heritage marker at the front door—it may be razed and a similar yet modern house built in its place. I understand. Everything changes, and we live through many evolutions. So many improvements and necessities as we proceed in this century, an old home may not suffice. Still, living in my old house (granted, easier in summer than winter) has enriched my life as I knew it would. It’s been an honor calling this place my home for the past twenty years.

Y’all headin’ to the Texas State Fair (where guns may or may not be permitted)?

I don’t go to the Texas Fair every year, you know, because it’s so expensive. But I was looking forward to attending this year for a concert on the Main Stage, the singer pretty much a hometown gal with a cool music style. So I thought I’d hang out a couple hours, ride some rides, eat the latest faire, then catch the evening show.

I’d been looking forward to this evening out for months, even wrote it on my calendar. Then I heard about the sudden and bizarre interference by the State of Texas. They took Texas State Fair to court over its official gun ban. That’s right: Only Texas would ban a gun ban. Or try to. The Texas State Fair, which is a nonprofit business and not an operating entity of state or city government, announced an official gun ban. This was due to the shooting last year. And wasn’t it around the last day of the fair? And didn’t the shooting happen in the overcrowded food court, a place under one roof? That scared off fair goers and made Texas out to be the Wild West of state fairs. Yee-hah!

Fair officials no doubt were mortified by the shooting (not to mention the liability). And all the rest of us wondered how did anybody sneak a gun into the fairgrounds. Well, if you just think about it, you can figure it out. Criminals know how to sneak in guns using only the bodies God gave them.

A shooting at the fair—a vibrant community unto itself which for people watchers had always been an entertaining and lively scene with the occasional risqué—was bound to happen given decades of unchecked gun proliferation. And bang! Bang, bang, bang! It happened—right among the baby strollers and diapered toddlers, their older siblings, parents, kinfolk and neighbors who ventured into Fair Park for just one day after traveling the metroplex and from all the little towns and cities across this state ironically named for being friendly.

The shooting, not at all shocking—I mean, come on—managed to kinda shut down our beloved state Fair. More than one generation of Texans, whether at the Fair or not, are traumatized for life, never to go to our state fair again.

Texas, we gotta problem

Poor Texas State Fair officials. Surely, they thought the most reasonable thing to do was implement and proudly announce a gun ban on fair premises.

Not in this state, buster. Try it, and you’ll be saw-ree. Our state government sues over such bans, dontcha know?

Poor Fair officials. Thought Texas allows businesses to decide for themselves if’n they’ll permit people with guns to enter their premises.

Sounds like some Yankee suits were a-tinkering with the great State Fair of Texas by implementing some sort of ‘gun control.’ In these parts, those fightin’ words.

What’s crystal clear among the blatant hypocrisy, bully tactics and fat-headedness that aptly describes our state’s top elected officials nowadays is they don’t give a bloody ’dillo about ensuring safety for tens of millions of Texas fairgoers—and instead come across as highly encouraging everybody and anybody to bring a gun to the Texas State Fair this year.

That’s the clear and dangerous message courtesy of the State of Texas. Confused young people with access to guns along with others whose delusions of grandeur are out of control (Texas doesn’t care about the mentally ill either, preferring the old 1870s adage: Pull yourself up by your bootstraps) have received the very loud and public call to show up at the Texas State Fair armed. Like it’s a mighty proud longstanding Texas tradition to carry guns everywhere.

Ironically, Texas shot itself in the foot taking the State Fair’s gun ban to court—because the latest ruling sides with Fair officials: No guns allowed.

For now.

Guess we’ll just have to dare go to the Texas State Fair … and hope for the best. Eh, it’s the 21st century. Aren’t we used to living this way already … everywhere we go?

Childless adults have always made everybody uncomfortable

I should know. For whatever reasons, I never had children. So, sue me.

And now this private matter has become a scolding stick by the political Right. When my colleagues find out I do not have children, their reaction has always been first one of sympathy and second a remark meant to be comforting, like “You’re better off.” Then they tell me the problems they’re having with their adolescents, serious ordeals I’m glad I don’t have to deal with. Child rearing is the hardest job in the world, I think we all can agree. After all, Oprah Winfrey (also childless) said it several times on her TV show. As a teacher, I suppose I know a lot more about kids and teens than my childless contemporaries who work in occupations that do not involve dealing with kids on a daily basis.

But more than one school principal has asked me point blank, “Are you a parent?” Like this means anything. The implication being that only parents make the best teachers. Allow me this one brutally honest clarification: Teaching and Parenting are not the same thing.

In fact, my feminist sisters assured me that a prospective boss or employer cannot ask our (women’s) parental status. They said it’s downright illegal. Nevertheless, it happens. Still. And come on, get over it. That boat has sailed. Maybe my figure looks like a woman who’s bore a few children. So it’s an assumption … made only by male supervisors. What’s up with that? Women supervisors never ask me if I have children. And male supervisors never ask men if they’re parents. So, childless is a sexist adjective. It is intentionally meant to insult and break us presumed emotionally frail women who’ve never reproduced. There was a time when people felt sorry for women who never had children or couldn’t have children. Those days are gone. Ehhh, we don’t need their pity anyway.

And that’s another problem with the Right: Women like me, who’ve never given live birth, aren’t ‘Marilyn Monroe’ about it. We’re not all emotionally broken, harboring a deep secret sorrow throughout our entire lives, on the verge of tears, feeling incomplete as women because we never became mothers. Instead, we carry on as career women (who are, more often than not, also mothers). Not having children is sad to a point, but in this country, I thought, work and career are most important. Look at how the U.S. treats mandatory time off after giving birth, still letting each business call the shots by offering a few weeks to a few months—then it’s get back to work. Compare with Germany that provides both mothers and fathers up to three years off after the birth of a baby. Now as a teacher, I can attest, that’s more like it. The first three years of a child’s life are the most important in overall emotional, physical and psychological development. The U.S. is so far behind on this human right.

They made Murphy Brown have a baby

The difference between women and men is we have a biological clock. Tick tock. Tick tock. We’re keenly aware of the best age to reproduce (our 20s). And if we miss it, it’s gone. Only the wealthy have access to additional methods to try to create a new life, one being in vitro fertilization. But wait, the Right has problems with that method (because it involves abortion).

A couple of decades ago, it was a woman’s choice to reproduce or not. There are many reasons why some women don’t have a baby already. Has the Right forgotten about genetics, miscarriages, still births, and myriad things that can go wrong with mother and/or unborn baby during pregnancy? Pregnancy is all about the gray in life, the uncertainties, never the assurance of a perfect healthy baby. It is a huge risk for some women. To know each woman’s reason for not having children would be heartbreaking—to people who have hearts.

When I was a single career gal in my 20s and 30s, I watched TV shows with characters relating to my lifestyle, like “Seinfeld,” “Cheers” and “Murphy Brown.” The latter intrigued me because I was a news reporter, and Murphy Brown was a TV journalist based in Washington, D.C. She was the consummate career woman who worked her way up from the 1960s covering every kind of story, mostly politics. But way after she was in her 40s, she became pregnant. And she made the decision to not marry the father but have the baby. It was a decision heard round the world because Vice President Dan Quayle made a big Republican deal about it, calling this decision, by a fictitious TV sitcom’s character, inappropriate and falsely influencing young girls to do the same. (Almost half of all American girls and women who give birth are unmarried, and it’s been this way since the 1980s.)

The “Murphy Brown” premise didn’t wash with me either. I knew the network suits made TV’s Murphy Brown have a baby to bring a contrived family angle. It was like the baby didn’t belong in Murphy’s world of political banter, investigative journalism, and high-pressure national TV news. It was strange. Yet most of my work colleagues in the news biz had children, managed to do their jobs and raise kids. If it were me, I don’t know what I would have done. But that was and still is how I’ve always seen my life and careers: as a service to mankind because I don’t have children.

In closing, let me point out the one fact that has been unspoken in American politics since the Clinton administration: Teen pregnancy is the number one reason for lifelong poverty. And it’s generational: A teen mother who has a child she cannot afford often becomes a grandmother of her teen daughter’s child that they both can’t afford, and so on. See, not every female will opt for abortion even if it’s legal. But the majority of teen mothers will remain in poverty for the rest of their lives. Their opportunities are few, their future bleak, their self-worth diminished. This is true for both mother and child(ren). Poor kids are the ones I teach.

It’s a lot to ask of every woman in this country: Get busy having babies. What may be a piece of cake to most women is not for everyone. And most importantly, to have or not to have children is a woman’s private matter; no one’s business; and, despite the Right’s assumption, not political—not in the slightest.

Assassination fascination

Our nation’s history is full of assassinated and wounded leaders by gunfire. We can list those killed by bullets: JFK, RFK, MLK, McKinley, Garfield, Lincoln.

Then there’s the lesser known yet much longer list of elected officials shot, some critically, but who survived an assassination attempt: from contemporaries like Gabby Giffords and Steve Scalise to further back in time Teddy Roosevelt and dozens more. Now joining that list is former President Donald Trump, shot while campaigning at a Republican rally in Pennsylvania.

In our supersonic social media age, supporters of Trump were quick to blame the Democrats, their presumed sworn enemy. More disconcerting, immediately after the shooting were their middle fingers shot at the mass media.

But no, the assassination attempt was not an enemy plot but just ‘the usual suspect’—spotted & killed almost as soon as the deadly shooting occurred—another troubled white young man, an American youth.

After bullets flew across the sky, killing one man in the crowd while critically injuring two others along with President Trump, the former President was quick to show a defiant fist and shout to his supporters “Fight! Fight! Fight!”—as if the assassination attempt was a long-awaited plot by his political foes to bring down our country.

No. Just another obscure white American man-child of 20. Essentially nothing is known about him as the FBI has interviewed not only his parents, relatives and neighbors but also his classmates from high school. He was a loner, never smiled, seemingly pathetic and friendless, neglected hygiene, no known mental illness or police record, didn’t leave a trail of rantings on social media or on paper but did have the makings of bombs in his home—a home with more than a dozen guns owned by his parent. A few hours before the Trump rally, this slim unassuming teen-age-looking male simply took one of his father’s AR-style rifles and lots of bullets. And because he knew nobody ever really noticed him, he was able to climb atop a nearby building, aim at Trump and took to shooting people.   

Why did he do it?

Isn’t it obvious? He was bullied all his life—like practically all the young white males in our country who foresee nothing but a grim future and believe shooting people, especially someone as famous as Donald Trump, will show up those who knew them. They’re not chicken. They’re men, damn it, and now everybody will know their names, maybe even respect them especially if they die in action.

The bullet that got away

Life is ironic sometimes. An assassin’s bullet that nicks an ear, totally missing the head and brain, brings thoughts if not assurances of ‘Someone up there’s watching out for me.’ Anyone who survived such a close call with death will often come to prayer or even start believing in a Supreme Being or Higher Power, maybe a higher purpose in their miraculously spared lives.

Then for others who count themselves in the lucky few, there’s the guilt of surviving such a deadly attempt when another died and others were severely injured with months of painful rehabilitation. Gunshot survivors will never be the same physically and emotionally. There’s a mass post traumatic stress disorder to cope with, too, when the shooting takes place in a crowd.

But a bullet to the ear is worth pondering. It’s as if Trump’s would-be assassin was trying to get through to someone who is known as a bully, someone who while serving as U.S. President was proud of coming across as a Tough Guy. Tough guys play on the weakness and politeness of everybody else in society, those who don’t speak up, those who don’t push back because it’s unbecoming.

That is likely what Trump’s would-be assassin learned from childhood that included lots of bullying as well as the tumultuous Trump presidency, if we’re being honest.

Someone that young, not even yet voting in a Presidential election, hasn’t lived long enough to decide his own politics. Apparently, he fell in line with everyone around him in his neck of the Pennsylvania woods and registered as a Republican. He just wanted to fit in, didn’t want to make waves, probably was never confrontational his entire life.

Yet he’ll go down in history as a murderer and attempted assassin of a former U.S. President.

This lone shooter, with no motive or political grudge against Trump or Republicans, got a gun and took to shooting people. Wonder if he gave a thought to the harm he would cause. Doubt it. Wonder if he thought he would really assassinate a former President. Perhaps. Wonder if he thought he’d live to tell why he did it, live the rest of his life in prison. Maybe. Did he think he’d be killed in the process? It happens all the time.

But … we and he know guns do a lot of damage in split seconds, death being the purpose of the weapon after all. Those, like President Trump, left with gunshot wounds and the surviving family of the man shot to death in the flurry of traveling bullets from a powerful rifle—where the shooter doesn’t really see his targets—along with all the rest of us Americans must deal with another sorry incident caused by a deeply troubled young man … who felt powerless … until holding a loaded gun.

Shootings are so common in America as to occur several times a day, causing more than 25,000 deaths a year by firearms and many more injuries. And … it’s never going to end, is it? It is the bold thick lengthy expanding red thread sewn into the tapestry of our nation’s history, tightly binding all us Americans together.

Dear Uncle Joe:

You know I love you, right? I love you as our nation’s President almost as much as I love President Jimmy Carter—and anyone who knows me will assure you that’s a helluva lot. I have no problem with any of your policies during your term in office as well as your leadership as Veep for President Barack Obama. Time and again, you’ve proven the naysayers underestimate you. And it’s been a lot of fun watching you win time and again and basically be right about everything. And it’s your wisdom, that truly comes from having served in DC for decades, that has made you a superior American president. Slow and steady wins the race. You taught us well. We appreciate you more than we can say. Hope you know that.

But … you were only supposed to serve one term. Remember? That was the plan. Four to five years ago, you knew age would become a problem for anyone in his 80s serving as U.S. President. And these times in which we are living are extremely difficult for us laypeople to understand, even more for all nationally elected officials the world over.

Come on. The very practical Joe Biden in 2020 would acknowledge and accept the natural progression of human frailty especially when turning 80. Your life has been stellar, inspirational, a dream come true in many ways. It’s been a damn good life, a long life—and, honey, it’s time to let someone else lead the Democratic Party.

Now don’t cry. Don’t you cry on me. I can’t stand to see a grown man cry. I know, it’s common among the elderly. Bless your heart, you can’t help it.

Look, we’re not kicking you to the curb. We just need a Democrat who can and will counter each and every lie spouted by Republican nominee President Donald Trump. We need that more than anything at this point in time.

So, allow the Democratic National Convention to do what they should have been doing all this time: scanning the nation for viable presidential candidates. You can be a big part of the process. Surely you have some ideas of viable contenders. You know everyone. I like the list from 2020, and all us Dems like the strong, popular and articulate governors like California’s Gavin Newsom and Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer. They could win. They could beat Trump. What’s more important than that?

And I——-will always love you——

You may not remember my best friend Jean, now deceased. But she was from your hometown of Wilmington, DE, and proudly knew you. She worked on your first campaign in the 1970s. She later moved to Dallas where the two of us became fast friends. She once told me I was one of a very few liberal Democrats she knew in Texas. And she always told me, “Joe Biden would make a great president!”

I didn’t think much about you in the 1990s when Jean and I became friends. I wanted Al Gore. But I was OK with Bill Clinton winning. Years later I would have voted for Hillary Clinton, but she would not commit to ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But Obama said he would end the wars. (The Republicans and their perpetual wars. What were they thinking? And for twenty long years.) So I voted for Obama over Hill to end the wars, and he was able to end only one of them. Then almost as soon as you took office, you ended the other forever war. It was abrupt, awful, deadly, messy, reminiscent of when we pulled out of Vietnam. But as always, you’ve proven you can do the most terrible jobs of a U.S. President. To your credit, we’re not entering another war. Let’s keep it that way.

My good friend Jean actually knew you. And I had faith in my best friend. After all, we were simpatico. I miss her so much, now more than ever. I do believe, however, that even Jean would be practical enough to talk candidly with you, as a Wilmington neighbor and lifelong supporter, about bowing out gracefully. Don’t run again in 2024. You’re beautiful. Be gracious. Allow candidates with experience and maturity and most of all the quick wit to call Trump’s constant BS. They learned from watching you, you know.

With this election, I’m not sure you are the only one who could beat Trump. And for perfect strategy, we could use someone younger, you know younger than Trump. Wouldn’t that be the ultimate counter: running someone younger?! Of course!

America really needs to get over electing the elderly for U.S. President. Why have both national political parties put us in this precarious position? Like we are to believe that Trump and Biden are the only possible candidates in the entire country for U.S. President? Don’t believe it for a minute. We can’t even talk about it for fear of upsetting our own elderly parents. Too old is too old. Our country has a minimum age for running for president. Makes sense we’d amend to cap the opposite end. I say 69. No one can and should run for U.S. President if older than 69. Fair enough? And no, we don’t need to wait and see if time will tell. After the unprecedented summer presidential debate, it’s crystal clear: Time is not on either political party’s side.

Trump is no Jesus Christ, so stop comparing them

Prayers and fasting for former President Donald Trump as he deals with his 34-count guilty verdict by a New York City jury for falsifying monetary business records specifically to cover up his tryst with a porn star misses the point. Trump has never been one to pray to God, though he accepts like a con man the fervent sincere prayers of his tens of millions of believers. Trump has never declared himself religious or spiritual. He plays to the crowd, not unlike his 1980s’ predecessor Ronald Reagan, knowing that in modern times conservative Christians are more likely to vote Republican than Democratic.

What I hate to see over and over again is Trump’s followers dragging Jesus into the mire with Trump, making Trump out to be a Christ figure. Trump is more anti-Christ than any President I know, and those who still choose to believe Trump over truth and justice are lost. God help ’em.

The same crowd, estimated to be a third to half of all Americans, will never proclaim a loud Facebook prayer for Jews, Palestinians, Ukrainians, Russians or even devout lifelong practicing Catholic U.S. President Joe Biden.

NO. The only person on earth that Trumpers care about is Trump. And they’re hoping for some ‘miracle’ that he returns to his throne in 2025.

The reposted memes twisting Jesus Christ with Trump proclaim:

Jesus was convicted in a sham trial … and crucified. I still follow him.

I AM MORE MAGA THAN EVER.

Pray for this man. He’s fighting an evil that we can’t even imagine!

And there are the visual imageries of an ethereal Jesus Christ with his hands on the shoulders of Donald Trump as if comforting him during his moment of sorrow—as if Trump is the presidential choice of Jesus Christ.

He’s not.

U.S. Presidents have no secrets

That’s because THEY’RE WORLD LEADERS IN A FREE SOCIETY WITH A FREE PRESS. Not to be vulgar, but every little thing about a U.S. President will be found out, made public, investigated, studied, analyzed and scrutinized for centuries. That’s the way it is and has always been like it or not.

It’s a BIG reason why most Americans will never run for any public office let alone U.S. President. And those who do run for top office, still 99% men, often get in trouble when their skeletons come tumbling out of their closets. Remember Gary Hart? John Edwards? Heck, even President Bill Clinton’s private sex life was displayed thoroughly on the World Wide Web now known as the internet. And he was President at the time, serving two terms, impeached for lying about an affair with a White House intern, and managed to remain in office. Congress didn’t have the votes to remove him. And the presidential hopefuls and President with found-out secrets were all Democrats.

So don’t tell me that Trump—former Democrat then Independent then Republican and now MAGA far-right Republican—is being set up by our nation’s Deep State. Trump is not an X File. The only government entities dealing with him are prosecutors and judges—and this because they have to; it’s their job. Like the FBI went after Hillary Clinton a couple of weeks before the 2016 election when she was the Democrat running for President. G-men cut both ways regardless of political affiliation.

Back to America’s Gospel Hour, Trump once proclaimed that he’s so popular, he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and never be prosecuted. Why would anyone running for U.S. President say he can kill a person and get away with it? That was crazy enough. But Trump is nonstop crazy talk. After his guilty verdicts, one of sexual assault and now falsifying business records to tilt the 2016 presidential election in his favor, he claimed the government (his government, our government) is out to get him.

Look, if Trump had never run for the highest office in the land, his many sordid secrets could very well have remained buried. But as he aged, his ego would not let him sit back and yap about how he could ‘turn this country around’ if he were President. So he had to go for it. He worked the populist method: stirring up s*&^ and blaming immigrants and minorities (nonwhites) and nonChristians for our nation’s problems. Then he gets elected, and what’s the first thing he does but give our country’s richest a massive tax cut lasting from here to eternity. Wow. Talk about helping the disenfranchised and downtrodden.

But that’s always been the Democrats’ goal when in power. And ironically, that goal of helping the majority of Americans, middle class to poor, relates to following Jesus Christ and true religious and spiritual teachings.

That’s how we the people can judge those who want to be and become U.S. President.

But our free democracy comes with a tragic flaw: The people have to believe in our country and its President—prioritized in order: after God, family, and our own minds.

America: Our homeless problem is Issue Number 1 (and can be solved)

For years it seemed in my neck of the urban woods, only one beggar holding a sign for money stood at every major thoroughfare. ‘Clever-like-a-fox’ we drivers passing by would think, noting the beggars always choose the busiest intersections along highways. Lately, they’re accompanied by groomed and well-behaved dogs, usually pit bulls. It’s surprising how clean and calm those dogs are, given their days are spent breathing in auto exhaust fumes from millions of passing cars and hearing loud nerve-racking engines. Dogs I know would bark angrily at all that noise.

But since the pandemic I suppose, we’re seeing A LOT MORE homeless people who’ve taken to sleeping everywhere and anywhere along our busiest city streets. They hang quilts somehow beneath overpasses where they evidently live and certainly sleep. They roll all their stuff in shopping carts or suitcases, again along the busiest thoroughfares. So we’re bound to see them when driving to and from our work-a-day jobs. And now after the pandemic, the homeless population has EXPLODED along our city streets—witness all their stuff strewn for blocks.

My city is no different from other cities and even suburbs and rural towns across the U.S. Homelessness has multiplied and expanded into our country’s most perplexing, yet solvable, problem. And yes, Americans, we are the ones responsible for solving this problem.

King of the road?

Most Americans are a paycheck away from joining the homeless population. When driving past their clusters or solitary adults, we think the same thing: drugs and/or mental illness. And we’re accurate to a point. What kind of person would stand on a street corner begging for money? Their signs never say HELP! as much as NEED MONEY or just $. No amount of a month’s collection would cover rent. So the coins and bills must go for drugs and liquor, solace for addiction and street life.

But during the pandemic of 2019-2021, thousands of jobs were cut, meaning tens of thousands of families had no choice but to leave their housing immediately and figure out where they are going to go and how they are going to live. It would explain why our nation’s public schools have lost tens of thousands of students with no way of finding them. They’re not enrolled in private schools, other public schools across the country or home schooled. Where’d everybody go?

We expect government social workers to find and help perpetual beggars. Yet, it’s always the same guys and occasional gals individually pan handling at street corners and more and more at convenience store entryways, store parking lots and during winter inside professional office buildings.

Why aren’t the cops clearing beggars from dangerous street corners? Surely the police don’t need citizens calling 911 every time we see a beggar. Yet day after day, the same faces are seen begging for money and maybe food. Street beggars nowadays usually carry a water bottle with them.

There’s a whole underground of homeless folks who’ve banned together and deal with their situation as intelligently as possible. One may pay for mobile phone plans they all share. Another pays a monthly health club membership for restroom and shower access. Another knows the best times to pick through restaurant garbage bins. There’s a way to survive on the streets, sort of. It’s clever and probably organized by our growing number of homeless veterans given our two 20-year wars. If anyone knows how to survive on nothing, it would be a person with firsthand war experience.

Who are the homeless? Years ago newspaper reporters got to know a few who were willing to share their hard-luck stories and provide access to their lifestyles. One couple raked in lotsa dough begging on the streets. Beats working for ‘the man,’ they’d say. There were addicts admittedly who, if you can believe it, had not reached rock bottom, still able to move and groove and pan handle on the streets.

Left unsaid about our nation’s homeless problem are the ‘burnt bridges.’ Perhaps quite a number of homeless individuals crashed on couches of family members who after a respectable amount of time kicked the relative freeloader to the streets. This happens all the time in many families. It’s called tough love.  

Speaking of love, why haven’t the mega churches mounted a campaign to go out and help the homeless and stop the crisis? If I were homeless and had absolutely no family to turn to, the places from which I’d first seek help are the largest, most impressive-looking churches. That’s where the money is. And when a beggar asks me for money, I advise him or her to ask a big church. Seek help there. But I can tell when the smile turns upside down, my sage suggestion goes in one ear and out the other. I ain’t gonna give them any money.

I used to, for years, until the city banned citizens from giving to pan handlers standing along the streets. When I was much younger and idealistic, I volunteered at a city homeless shelter, one that took in families with kids instead of individual adults. The kids were taken by bus to school every day. Most parents had jobs, even junk cars parked in an adjacent lot. But … the families could not afford rent, groceries and utilities on a low-income job or even two or three jobs. They were on waiting lists for low-income housing. They were allowed one month to stay at the homeless shelter, then they’d have to pack all their stuff in trash bags and go out to find another shelter with their kids in tow. The families would make the rounds and return within a year. Their plight never ended. Meanwhile, the kids are growing up.

The mean streets of America

People who don’t have a home due to whatever reason still have one thing: freedom. It’s why addicts stay away from family who love them. It’s also why people from dysfunctional families would rather live on the streets than return to live with parents and siblings they know well. Family abuse was a big reason women told me why they refused to move in with the families who raised them. Hurt, anger and hatred are so deep, emotional wounds so fresh, living on the streets and staying high is preferable.

The issue of mental illness prohibits most people from reaching out and personally helping the homeless. There’s a story about a homeless woman in NYC. A businessman walked past her every day for ten years. She yelled obscenities and smelled bad. One day she was gone, the man noticed. A year later, she spotted the businessman, the one who always saw her and ignored her. She had been taken to a hospital where she stayed until the right medication made it possible for her to live a normal life. She went up to the man and bawled him out, telling him if she had been bleeding from a physical wound, he would have called an ambulance and tried to help her. But because she was filthy and yelling, obviously mentally ill, he left her alone.

Americans could ban together and end homelessness, at least reduce it. People should never have to resort to living on the streets. And the homeless are first human beings, second dealing with major problems THAT CAN BE FIXED. Austin’s building tiny houses for their homeless folks, and LA’s giving some homeless people $1,000 a month—trying something instead of doing nothing. Habitat for Humanity has been a nonprofit solution where the recipient family must contribute ‘sweat equity’ in the building of their new simple house as the rest is installed by volunteer carpenters and electricians—usually all in one day. But it requires a city’s blessing and private landowners to donate property for the cause.

Until we admit there’s an undeniable crisis in America with homelessness, the rows of one-man tents, hanging quilts and strewn clothing will continue to stretch from sea to shining sea.